Posted on 08/15/2008 2:43:50 PM PDT by wagglebee
LifeNews.com Note: Austin Ruse is president of the New York and Washington DC-based Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute. These views are his alone and do not reflect the position of C-FAM. Ruse is also a member of the McCain Catholic Steering Committee and one of the first pro-life advocates to endorse McCain.
If John McCain picks a pro-abortion running mate, he's likely to lose. If he picks a pro-abortion Catholic as his running mate, he will definitely lose.
Right now McCain is skating on the thinnest of ice. At best, the election is tied. In many polls, he is 4-5 points down. He has yet to crack 45 percent in any national poll and is behind in key states. At worst, he is facing a blowout. Now is not the time to mess around with a guy like Tom Ridge.
The calculation is clear.
McCain figures Ridge could deliver the key state of Pennsylvania. Let's look at the record.
Ridge won statewide office in 1994 with only 45 percent of the vote. Why so low? Because he faced a third party pro-life challenger named Peg Lustig who polled a whopping 12 percent of the vote. Ridge ran again in 1998 and won with the much greater margin of 57 percent, but he did so against a very weak Democratic opponent and he forfeited 10 percent to pro-life Lustig, who ran again.
That Ridge, now, ten years later, could help McCain win Pennsylvania is far from certain. And then there is what McCain loses elsewhere for picking Ridge.
McCain is already suspect among social conservatives. And picking a pro-choicer will have the further effect of cooling whatever ardor he has been able to gin up among them mostly because of the fear of Obama. Social conservatives are largely not for McCain, they are against Obama. A lack of enthusiasm among McCain supporters could spell disaster for him come Election Day.
There is already a major effort underway to lure pro-lifers into the Democratic column.
The Democratic platform makes nice noises about motherhood and adoption. And evangelicals are getting restless to get involved in other issues. The McCain camp should not give them yet one more reason to drift.
And then there is the Catholic thing.
At the moment, McCain can expect at least tepid support among faithful Catholics, those who go to Mass at least once a week and who support the teachings of the Church on core issues like abortion. He needs this group to win the election.
He is putting them in an untenable position if he decides to pick Ridge - or any pro-choicer, but especially a pro-choice Catholic.
Tom Ridge is a public dissenter from one of the core teachings of the Catholic Church, that innocent human life must always be protected and may never be deliberately taken. McCain is asking faithful Catholics to pull the lever for someone whose position on abortion makes them sick to their stomachs.
A prediction: if McCain goes ahead with Ridge, it will lead to a public spectacle.
Wasn't McCain paying attention four years ago when another publicly dissenting Catholic ran for president? John Kerry lost the generic Catholic vote, that is, any person who claims to be a Catholic, whether he or she has not been to Mass in thirty years or even marginally agrees with the teachings of the Church.
This is an easy get for the Democrats, yet Kerry lost them. With the exception of his home state of Massachusetts, he even lost them in the states he won.
Kerry and Communion became a staple of the public debate. For the first time ever, the Eucharist was front and center in a national political campaign. There is no doubt this would happen again, perhaps this time with even greater controversy.
McCain would face the dead certainty that his vice-presidential running mate could not speak in front of official Catholic audiences or at Catholic institutions because this is forbidden by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
In 1998, Ridge was told by his hometown bishop, Donald Trautman of the Diocese of Erie, that he could not speak on church property. In this year's presidential race, Ridge would be told by bishops around the country not to present himself for Communion.
This would become a recurrent nightmare for the McCain campaign week after week after week. Is that a winning message for McCain?
Finally, McCain is asking Republicans to accept a man who, if he wins, would likely be the presumptive presidential nominee sometime in the future.
This would effectively turn the Republicans away from being the pro-life party and would spell electoral disaster for Republicans for years to come. Pro-lifers certainly would have a very hard time voting for a pro-choicer at the top of the national ticket. Look at what happened to Rudy Giuliani in the primaries.
And they certainly would never support a publicly dissenting Catholic. The way of Ridge is the way of both defeat and disaster.
This would effectively turn the Republicans away from being the pro-life party and would spell electoral disaster for Republicans for years to come. Pro-lifers certainly would have a very hard time voting for a pro-choicer at the top of the national ticket. Look at what happened to Rudy Giuliani in the primaries.
Excellent point!
Pro-Life/Catholic Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
The fact that McCain would even consider a Pro-Abortion VP shows that he will also be willing to nominate a Pro-Abort to the Supreme Court.
I’m hesitant enough about McCain as it is, Ridge would be the last straw.
no true Catholic is pro-abortion. simple as that.
To me , McCain’s stock has gone way up but ...
If he goes with ridge , I am out.
I will not vote for any ticket with a baby killer on it. period.
Wait, Catholics all across the country elect pro-abortion candidates to the Senate, House and local govts. Why would they change their voting habits for the presidency?
Precisely. There are plenty of pro-life conservatives to choose from, nominating a pro-abortion VP is a clear indication that he really doesn’t care and can’t be trusted.
“Pro-Abortion Catholic”
talk about yer oxy-moron!!!!!!!!
sheesh
mrs
McCain thinks he has us, because we fear the Obamination so much.
*********************
I know what you mean. My first response was disgust and a feeling of betrayal.
I am sure there are many like us who would find it difficult to vote for McCain if he chose Ridge.
Again. No baby killers. It’s a complete deal breaker for me.
McCain loses with Ridge an election he can easily win otherwise.
Low turnout from the base equals President Obama. Higher taxes, weakened national security, the Harvard Law faculty running the Supreme Court...
“Wait, Catholics all across the country elect pro-abortion candidates to the Senate, House and local govts.”
there is no such animal as the Catholic you describe, cafeteria catholics are not Catholics
mrs
McCain is using a brilliant strategy by not removing anyone from the list of who he is considering. Since he will have the luxury of naming his VP after Obama he can afford to let the media fantasize to their hearts content. The only thing in the end that matters is his actual choice. You can bet McCain’s choice will be at least somewhat based on Obama’s.
Baloney. If they go to a Catholic church and vote for Kennedy or Clinton they are still Catholics. Just because YOU don't call them that doesn't mean they don't.
...short list is Ralph Nader, Lieberman, John Kerry..etc..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.