Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faloi
... then not actually getting any of the money to the artists they're supposed to be defending.

Keep in mind that the RIAA does not represent any artists at all. It merely represents the recording companies which sign the artists. The RIAA is under no obligation to give any of its collected money to the artists signed by the companies.

11 posted on 08/15/2008 6:20:42 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102
Keep in mind that the RIAA does not represent any artists at all. It merely represents the recording companies which sign the artists. The RIAA is under no obligation to give any of its collected money to the artists signed by the companies.

True, but if they're going to do that, they lose the right to wrap themselves in the welfare of the artists like they do. There's nothing immoral about defending the interests of a legal business, even a perhaps justifiably unpopular one, but there is something immoral about being dishonest.

14 posted on 08/15/2008 7:03:27 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

You can go to Amazon right now and buy the complete recordings of Robert Johnson (41 tracks cut for the Vocalion label in the mid thirties) for $22.99. I would sure like to know how much money the Johnson heirs get from each sale.


20 posted on 08/15/2008 7:46:23 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (America's never won a "war" unless the enemy was named using a proper noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson