[HerrBlucher]

One, name one point of substance in Unfit for Command that has been "discredited" and give me the specific, affirmative evidence that "discredits" it along with links to a reliable source. Two, the exact same thing with respect to Corsi's new book. Should be easy for you, no?

Ditto here, lets go over the SPECIFICS one by one, maybe we can actually get somewhere. Simply saying Corsi's books have been discredited without providing detailed supporting evidence is a complete waste of time.

[colorado tanker]

Exactly. You and I both know that no such evidence exists. What we have here is an MSM hoax.

This is a variation of the old trial lawyer saw: "If you don't have the law, argue the facts. If you don't have the facts argue the law. And if you don't have either, lie and say your opponent has been 'discredited.' Oh, and is a racist, to boot."

[FreedomPoster]

>>Simply saying Corsi’s books have been discredited without providing detailed supporting evidence is a complete waste of time.

Ditto that.

Thursday night I was sitting in an airport bar waiting for a plane, and MSNBC was on one of their screens. Some MSNBC female talking head was saying exactly that about Corsi and the Swiftvets, and of course provided nothing. They find one or two minor issues, and use that to run with the “IT HAS ALL BEEN DISCREDITED!” Big Lie. Of course, they never address the core big issues.