Posted on 08/14/2008 4:06:08 AM PDT by dascallie
Not if it puts Hillary in the White House.
I've always said that Obama is the weaker candidate. He can be more easily beaten than Hillary. McCain needs an easy victory. That's the only way he can win.
Hillary won’t get the black vote. She’ll go down in flames.
DV, I believe it was Rush that I recently heard state that
should Obama suddenly stop in his tracks, the media
would be stricken with ANAL poisoning!
Oh, so true !!
hahahahahaaaaa!
hahahaaaa! :^D
Obama is just a figure head puppet of the left.
........................................................................................................................
This seems to be almost beyond controversy. The more I learn about Obamalamadingdong the more convinced I am that, on his own, he could not organize a circular pudpulling party. I don’t think it is even remotely possible that his whole campaign is his own contrivance, this is the man who published an autobiography when nobody knew his name, it makes no sense. Somebody else was controlling him even then. He obviously is incapable of coherent thought and his only ability is that of reading a teleprompter in a deep voice.
Hillary wont get the black vote.
Shell go down in flames.
- - - - - - - - - -
Hmmm. Not so sure. History shows that Blacks vote "D" about NINETY percent of the time, however.
BUT ... this year COULD be different. Some might just SIT OUT the election ???
I am not so sure that there will be ANY fleeing to McRINO by Blacks should Hillary STEAL the nomination from The Obamassiah.
But I can tell you THIS for sure. My Dad declared to me in 2002 that if Hillary were to run for President, he WOULD vote for her (and he WOULD, too). Just a couple of weeks ago, he told me that he would be voting for a Republican (McRINO) for the first time ever.
So if Hillary DOES get the nomination, my Dad would switch from his current intention of voting for McRINO / AGAINST Obama to FOR HILLARY!
That is guaranteed. That is, unless my brother and I might sway him to stick with McRINO. Very unlikely, I think. He LOVED Bill and is hell bent for Hillary.
I agree. When I joined the service, I had to declare a religion (for my records and my dog tags). I had no prior religious experience, so I said "none." Somehow, my records and dog tags ended up showing "Catholic." I still believe it was some sort of Papist conspiracy. ;)
For years I tried to get it changed, to no avail. I eventually because a Catholic, so the records would be correct well, there was more to it that that. ;)
Anyway, if I hadnt become Catholic, someone could look at my records and say Id been Catholic since the 80s.
I believe it is one vote per state delegation, simple majority required for within each state delegation and overall among all state delegations.
I dont think it is even remotely possible that his whole campaign is his own contrivance, this is the man who published an autobiography when nobody knew his name, it makes no sense. Somebody else was controlling him even then.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Unlike Kerry, Obama Covets Soros' Support (7-28-2004 Article)
Secondly, this Indonesian school record information has been around since 2006. The photo caption on the Daylife site indicates "18 months ago." The Chicago Tribune's article was written in March 2007, American Expat in Southeast Asia posted the info on the school record on his blog in January 2007, a translation of an Indonesian news story dated July 2006. There's probably more sources out there, because it was never a secret, and never disputed by Obama.
So according to the renowned expert Andy Martin, the Indonesian press, the AP, the Chicago Tribune and anyone else who reported on this are involved in a deep, dark conspiracy? Huh?
It's new news to some.
Some voters.
Thanks for that, (I assume you are speaking about the Electoral college) but we were talking about Congress approving a challenge. See posts #41 & #16
I’ve gotten so many different answers to who enforces the Constitutional requirements that it gets quite confusing.
I want to acknowledge the assistance of my Internet research assistants in preparing this story on very short notice. We have research assistance from the "sandbox" ("Iraq") to the sandlots, to the sandy beaches, and they are an invaluable part or ContrarianCommentary.com. Thanks team. Watch for an Andy Martin exclusive on the Hillary for President movement. August 14th (evening edition) Exclusive to ContrarianCommentary.com and nowhere else.
The bosses who have sex with underlings learned that it was OK.
People who cheated on their wives learned that it is OK.
Politicians who took bribes learned that it is OK.
Drug users learned it was OK.
Business men learned that selling secrets to China is OK.
People with no moral compass learned that they were OK, and that having one of their own in the White House was very comfortable...
Ahhh, I didn't realize that they were below quorum, thanks to the foot-draggers in Capitol City.
He'll switch parties publicly recognize his true leanings when it is expedient.
Application and/or acceptance of Indonesian citizenship by or for the minor child Obama would have no effect on his U.S. citizenship status.
Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Briefly stated, these acts include:
obtaining naturalization in a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);
taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);
entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);
accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);
formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);
formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only under strict, narrow statutory conditions) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);
conviction for an act of treason (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).
-30-
As a minor child, Obama lacked the legal status to perform any of these specified acts “voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship” and whatever his stepfather did or Indonesian operation of law did cannot disquaify his for the presidency.
Therefore, this will not be a legal disqualifier, but will again raise huge “who is this guy?” issues.
A human can run a rabbit to exhaustion.
Rabbit. It's what's for dinner.
The FEC doesn't do much other than watch the money flow. The eligibility issue is left to the states.
The candidate has to apply to have his name on the ballot in each state. The application form probably has a statement where he affirms his eligibility. The govt probably assumes people are telling the truth and leaves it up to us citizens to show otherwise.
If the RATS nominate Obama, and he is later thrown off the ballot in a couple of key states, they would have a real problem on their hands. I assume they would talk him into stepping down.
At this point, I still expect him to be the nominee. If it really is true that he became an Indonesian citizen, the RATS will still have a problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.