Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: $$ Still Flows To Edwards' Ex (Did This Have To Be Reported To The IRS? Was It?
CBS News ^ | 8/13/2008 | Staff

Posted on 08/13/2008 3:53:25 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Former presidential candidate John Edwards knew his ex-mistress, Reille Hunter, was receiving payments from his former campaign finance chairman, according to the National Enquirer, the publication that broke the story of Edwards' affair.

What's more, says the Enquirer, it has "uncovered that Edwards' political operatives are still paying" Hunter.

After months of denials, Edwards admitted to the affair, but vehemently denied fathering a baby with Hunter, or knowing she was being paid.

Edwards said, "I've never paid a dime of money to any of the people that are involved. I've never asked anybody to pay a dime of money, never been told that any money's been paid."

If the story is true, asked CBS News correspondent Blanca Soloranzo, the question remains, where did the money paid by the former Edwards campaign finance committee chairman, Fred Baron, come from?

...

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; breckgirl; democratcandidate; democrats; edwards; hushmoney; johnedwards; reillehunter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
If someone gave money/gifts/property to Reille Hunter and if the amount was over $12,000, wouldn't the person giving the gift(s) have to report this on their tax forms? Wouldn't the person receiving the money have to report it on their tax forms?

And if someone gave money to another person, who then gave this money to Reille Hunter, wouldn't the person giving the money have to report it on their tax forms, followed by the person receiving it, followed by Reille Hunter receiving it?

Just questions, just mere speculation, but there would be legalities involved if this CBS story were true.

1 posted on 08/13/2008 3:53:28 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Whay say you?


2 posted on 08/13/2008 3:53:48 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist (Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
When the money to Hunter stops, the paternity suite for child care will follow...
3 posted on 08/13/2008 3:57:52 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The person giving money in excess of 12K will have to file a gift tax return. I don’t believe the recipient of the gift is required to report it.


4 posted on 08/13/2008 4:01:31 PM PDT by keepitreal ("I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message. . . until I don't.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

“I’ve never paid a dime of money to any of the people that are involved. I’ve never asked anybody to pay a dime of money, never been told that any money’s been paid.”

This guy is a lawyer and this was practiced. Use your Clintonian decoder ring:

“I’ve never paid a dime...”

No dimes!
And if he means no money, then, still, he wasn’t the one paying.

“I’ve never asked anybody to pay...”

They volunteered! Gee, it would sure help me out and help make you the predidential chief of staff if this little problem went away...

“never been told that any money’s been paid”

Was he told it was going to be paid? Did he know it was paid? Did he know it was going to be paid? He doesn’t answer any of these questions.

That was a classic literal answer designed to get people to report something he didn’t say.


5 posted on 08/13/2008 4:02:45 PM PDT by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I can’t understand your worldview?


6 posted on 08/13/2008 4:03:13 PM PDT by STD (Reparations & Apologies for Slavery --Jesse Jackson's New Cabinet Position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It must be a job-related occupational hazard for democratic presidential candidates to cheat on their wives. Lyndon Johnson, Kennedy, Clinton, Edwards, are just the ones that history has caught.
7 posted on 08/13/2008 4:11:22 PM PDT by californio (Coast Guard Vet/ 211 Dick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Yup, my thoughts exactly...

The one giving the gift is responsible for declaring and paying the taxes... And it’s a pretty hefty tax as well, IIRC the gift tax is 55%, but I could be wrong. I also believe that there’s a $1,000,000 exemption option as well, but I could also have that wrong too.

The tax code is NOT my forte.

Mark


8 posted on 08/13/2008 4:11:59 PM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

follow the money...


9 posted on 08/13/2008 4:12:29 PM PDT by InsensitiveConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

He could gift $12k to 100 people who in turn gifted her $12k each she would have $1.2 million tax free and unreportable.


10 posted on 08/13/2008 4:13:34 PM PDT by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starrgaizr

I’m sure these statements by Edwards could be technically true. If he never asked that money be paid, but his bag man made arrangements without telling Edwards, it could be technically true. But I’m sure there were understandings of what was supposed to happen. It could well be that Edwards and his bagman discussed the situation without Edwards specifically giving the orders to pay her off.

And it could well be that Edwards told the money man he didn’t want to know any details of what he did.

I think this is called “plausible deniability”? Edwards possibly can truthfully say that he never asked that money be paid, and it may be truthful that nobody ever told Edwards that the deed was done.

But, somewhere, somehow, a signal was sent that Edwards wanted this done.


11 posted on 08/13/2008 4:14:33 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

That statement sounds like Clinton’s “I never told any person to lie, not ever”.


12 posted on 08/13/2008 4:16:18 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

she is in on the whole scam. By refusing to allow the paternity test she is saying to all the world that Edwards IS the father. If he wasn’t she would be the first to should the negative results.


13 posted on 08/13/2008 4:17:49 PM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001

She’s getting $15,000 a month and gets to live in a $3,000,000 home to keep quiet. If anything happens to her payola, she’ll be the first one in court demanding payment.


14 posted on 08/13/2008 4:24:07 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Once a LIAR, always a LIAR. Nough said!!!


15 posted on 08/13/2008 4:27:52 PM PDT by blondee123 (NO-BAMA for President in 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicus2001
To: DB she is in on the whole scam. By refusing to allow the paternity test she is saying to all the world that Edwards IS the father. If he wasn’t she would be the first to should the negative results.

Wouldn't doubt that she signed something saying she would not ask for a paternity test as long as she keeps getting her money!

He covered his A$$ in case this ever came out in public!

16 posted on 08/13/2008 4:30:15 PM PDT by blondee123 (NO-BAMA for President in 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
if the taxes are paid on money when it's made, the govt can tax it a second time if you give it away???
17 posted on 08/13/2008 5:01:37 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: californio
Lyndon Johnson, Kennedy, Clinton, Edwards, are just the ones that history has caught

Don't forget FDR who was running around even though he couldn't walk. Like NY's Gov. Paterson who was seeing other women even though he couldn't see.

18 posted on 08/13/2008 5:05:13 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Strange how they refer to her as his “ex.” Before the National Enquirer story broke, he was still seeing her...not hardly an “ex.”


19 posted on 08/13/2008 5:11:20 PM PDT by toldyou (Even if the voices aren't real they have some pretty good ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

So his campaign manager was sending money to them, regularly, but didn’t know why he was doing it, and Edwards never told him to do it??????


20 posted on 08/13/2008 5:14:32 PM PDT by cookcounty ("Yes we can't!!!" ---Gasbag Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson