Both of which prove what? Not to mention, who was on the 911 tape? Are you saying that you heard it? Because the same news sources that you are relying on here, say that you are aLIAR. http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/15763432/detail.html
"City Attorney John Mullen wrote the North County Times that the 911 tapes won't be released, saying they "are part of the investigatory file in this matter and are therefore exempt" from Public Records Act disclosure rules."
aka New Orleans PD - oh wait that could never happen.
You live in New Orleans? I thought that you lived in San Diego? Can't you make up your mind.
I am willing to use common sense. First I wouldn’t brandish a firearm, second I would shoot someone to keep my car from getting scratched.
Because you are sure that's what happened.
A 911 tape is evidence. And golly gee willerkers, the DA agrees with me!!!!
So if the DA agrees that's all that matters? Not to mention we only have your assertion that the DA agrees. Sometimes the DA will bring charges in a close case and decide that it's best for the Jury to decide.
Here's an idea. Why not wait for the Jury's decision! Wait, that would make TOO MUCH SENSE!
I could care less why you question, you obviously will blindly support cops who shoot little children in crowded parking lots.
Yeah, that's what I am doing. [/sarcasm] (Please seek help) [/not sarcasm]
Dude get over yourself. He shot the woman and the boy. Unless he was outside his car or she had a gun there is no justification in this instance for his use of deadly force.
Oh wait he’s a cop, that makes it ok.