I just don’t agree with that opinion. We don’t know the entire story (well, REDNESSS might but he ain’t sharing), but we do know the mom has a history of driving drunk and was tested at twice the legal level with a kid in the car. That’s not a victim. That’s a criminal. Have a great day, drift.
“That’s not a victim. That’s a criminal. Have a great day, drift.”
She may be guilty of drunk driving, that has not been decided in court. Most likely she was drunk or under the influence.
As far as I know that is not a capital offense in California.
Again, all he knew when he opened fire was that she was driving erratically and was angry. He did not have her blood tests nor did he know her criminal history.