Georgian conflict leaves west reeling and Russia walking tall

Guardian ^ | 8/12/2008 | Ian Traynor, Ian Black

[monday]

“I meant the non-feminist, love a big strong man female was coming out in me.”

Oh, pardon me. I hadn’t realized that women had become so feminist that actual women had to act only subliminally female in order to fit in. Strange world we live in.

[autumnraine]

Oh take your sarcasm elsewhere.

It was a play on society today seeing it as wrong for a woman to be swooned by masculinity. But whatever. Take the argument baiting to another poster.

[Winniesboy]

It's rather more than an 'occasional contrary piece'. The Guardian regularly carries a wide range of opinion, much of it at variance with its own editorial line - but that's liberal journalism for you. Yet as far as that editorial line itself is concerned, I don't recall a particularly pro-Russian slant in its comment on the recent series of Anglo-Russian spats - Litvinenko, the British Council, BP. That it is of the left, which is beyond doubt, doesn't necessarily, in the British context anyway, make it pro-Russian.

[kinghorse]

Apparently Georgia is giving the US control of their ports so you could see a Pusan retreat with the USA protecting the refugees and establishing a perimeter. This could be the start of something very big.

[kinghorse]

Apparently Georgia is giving the US control of their ports so you could see a Pusan retreat with the USA protecting the refugees and establishing a perimeter. This could be the start of something very big.

[monday]

I wasn't being sarcastic and wasn't baiting you. I was totally sincere. I think it is a strange world that demands women behave other than in a way they would normally. Don't you?

Sorry if you read sarcasm into my posts. It wasn't intended. Well maybe the first just a bit, but mostly I was just curious.