Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

Just think if they were fair and balanced, there readership[ would grow by 50% easily.


3 posted on 08/12/2008 1:42:11 PM PDT by nckerr (www.myspace.com/ArmyKerrFamily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nckerr

hey pinch..nah nah nah...nah nah nah nah..hey hey hey ..goodbye...


6 posted on 08/12/2008 1:47:51 PM PDT by y6162 (uot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: nckerr; abb
Just think if they were fair and balanced, their readership would grow by 50% easily.
They cannot; it would run counter to the very reason for the existence of "objective" journalism. Which is to create a single voice speaking to the entire country. That is what the Associated Press is.

16 posted on 08/12/2008 2:21:37 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: nckerr
It's more than just an issue of editorial balance.

Thanks to wide Internet availability and 24-hour news channels, people can get the news far faster than any printed newspaper in the USA. As such, by the time we actually get the paper the news in the paper may already be out of date. And it's going to get worse as people with EVDO-enabled cellphones (like those from Sprint and Verizon Wireless) and HSDPA 3G cellphones (like those from AT&T and T-Mobile) can get the latest news (including streaming video!) just by turning on their cellphone.

32 posted on 08/12/2008 6:17:23 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson