Perhaps. But if we're just discussing AIDS here, then based on your view of what causes AIDS, homosexuality is completely irrelevant. Whatever religious or moral aspects there may be regarding homosexuality, the only issue is drug use, so we shouldn't care about homosexuality for purposes of this discussion.
We can have a discussion regarding the health problems associated with anal sex (both straight and gay), but it should be completely separate from the AIDS discussion, if we accept your argument regarding the cause of AIDS.
Actually, homosexuality is not completely irrelevent. It was the perverted sexual lifestyle of fast-track homosexuals that led to the need for the very drugs that were killing them like flies. They couldn’t sustain the number of sexual partners their perversion required without taking massive amounts of chemicals, which in turn, over a long period of time, destroyed their immune systems. Then, on top of that, the public health authorities told them to wear condoms instead of telling them to stop the drugs that were destroying the immune systems. And if that wasn’t bad enough, then the AIDS establishment sealed their fate by putting them on cytotoxic chemotherapies, like AZT. In short, I would say your side has one hell of a lot to answer for.
Thought you might be interested in #32 and #33, etc.
Not necessarily. AIDS is still, by and large, a gay disease, just not for the reason usually put forward.