Posted on 08/12/2008 8:59:23 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
A MYTH THAT KILLS: AIDS INDUSTRY FEEDS ON FEAR
July 3, 2008 --
THE Senate is near to pass ing a massive $50 billion Emergency Plan for HIV/ AIDS Relief - a bill whose priorities are based on myth, just like virtually all anti-AIDS efforts worldwide.
The world's top AIDS bureaucrat recently admitted the truth: "It is very unlikely that there will be a heterosexual epidemic" outside Africa, Kevin de Cock, director of the World Health Organization, told London's Independent newspaper. His bosses at the United Nations issued an official denial - but couldn't truly challenge his science.
The effort to "democratize" AIDS dates back to the mid-1980s, when the media and health officials began a desperate and concerted effort to divert attention and make it seem everyone was at risk. The 1985 Life magazine cover, blaring "NOW NO ONE IS SAFE FROM AIDS" in huge red letters, represents this effort. Surgeon General Everett Koop coined the term "heterosexual AIDS explosion" in 1987, while in 1993 HHS Secretary Donna Shalala told Congress that AIDS may leave "nobody left."...
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
|
If you would like to be added to the RETHINKING AIDS PING LIST drop me a FReepmail. AIDS is the biggest public health scam in medical history. Like global warming, AIDS is being used to push a powerful leftist political agenda. For over two decades the Public Health Establishment has used your tax dollars and the full power of the federal government to wage a massive propaganda (and intimidation) campaign designed to: (A) prevent the American public from hearing the scientific evidence that suggests HIV may not cause AIDS Every single point above can be documented on my profile page. If you would like to be added to the RETHINKING AIDS PING LIST drop me a FReepmail. |
Ping!
Smart people are not at risk.
They’re worried about their funding drying up.
I don’t understand why the opposition to this idea is so rabid. I mean, Duerberg’s work seems to be based on some solid scientific investigation - why can’t the supporters of the traditional view about AIDS just put their research on the table too, and see which is right? Why all the rabid screeching about “pseudo-science” and “flat earth” and whatnot?
I think that's the big issue right there. Funding is on the line, just like with AGW.
==They’re worried about their funding drying up.
Precisely. Now that the Republicans are in the minority (which hopefully means they start behaving like conservatives again) they should start demanding a full-scale congressional investigation into the AIDS scandal. Can you imagine how the AIDS establishment will look when the America people find out that AIDS only accounts for 3.7 percent of worldwide mortality, but receives 25% of ALL WORLD HEALTH CARE AID!!! Sooner or later, heads are going to roll. I’d prefer that it be sooner!
HIV/AIDS is like smoking. People and deviants that persist in behaving in a perverted or unhealthy fashion get the disease. Stop smoking, stop homosexual behavior, and both problems go away. Homosexual behaviorists are the #1 vector for human disease in the world including HIV, Herpes Simplex II, gonorrhea, syphilis, chancroid, drug resistant TB, cytomegalovirus, etc but hey, it is their choice and they march in parades, consume fecal material and are proud of it. To think what they do in the privacy of their own bedrooms has no impact on other people is ludicrous. 10s of billions of dollars flushed down a rathole would be better spent.
The AIDS activists were getting away with having it both ways. Anyone who opposed government funding for HIV/AIDS research or help for HIV infected people was accused of being homophobic, while, at the same time, they were denying that AIDS was largely confined to male homosexuals and intravenous drug users in the developed world.
I think the best explanation is the sheer size of government science. Once the number of scientists feeding at the public trough become disproportionate to their private industry counterparts, scientists can be effectively controlled by the political interests that control the money/power.
PS And that money and power is currently held by the virus-hunters (and their leftwing allies) with respect to AIDS.
Did, you get a chance to take a look at The Hidden Agenda Behind HIV? This one will make your blood boil (and help answer your question above).
They still are, but not for long. The public is starting to wake up to their silly game, and it's only a matter of time before the whistleblowers are going to feel safe to start blowing their whistles. As I said above, HEADS WILL ROLL!
==HIV/AIDS is like smoking. People and deviants that persist in behaving in a perverted or unhealthy fashion get the disease.
You don’t know how right you are! Go to my profile page and read the “Statement.” If you agree that what is contained there deserves to be investigated, drop me a FReepmail and I’ll add you to the RETHINKING AIDS ping list.
All the best—GGG
There.
Fixed it.
I am always amazed that beached whales are never included in the shotgun blasts.
Even though their "disease" is costlier than the other two combined.
I just love PC...
Nice touch! I would only add “and kills people with it.” See my profile page for more. If you agree with the statement and think the AIDS scandal needs to be investigated, drop me a FReepmail and I’ll add you to the RETHINKING AIDS ping list.
All the best—GGG
I think you need to read GGG's materials at the links he provides. According to GGG's research, homosexual sex IS NOT the cause of AIDS, as HIV is not sexually transmitted and HIV does not cause AIDS (according to the material he links to).
According to the material GGG references as the AIDS Rethinking project, the incidence of AIDS in the developed world is drug related, I think amyl nitrate is mentioned specifically, and in the third world, the incidence of AIDS is related to poverty and its attendant malnutrition.
Do I have that about right, GGG?
==HIV is not sexually transmitted
Not true. HIV is sexually transmitted, but AIDS Rethinker scientists don’t believe that HIV is sufficient to cause AIDS.
==Do I have that about right, GGG?
Mostly. Although, many other drugs are involved, not just poppers (heroine, cocain, etc...and then there is the EXTREMELY toxic chemotherapy drugs they use to treat AIDS patients. Unlike cancer, where you are put on chemotherapy on a temporary basis, with AIDS they keep you on these drugs for a lifetime.
See the “Conservative and Libertarian Press” section of my profile page for excellent Rethinking AIDS introductions written for the layman. If you read the statement from “The Group for the Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis” and agree with it, drop me a FReepmail and I’ll add you to my RETHINKING AIDS ping list—GGG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.