To: Caramelgal
==Doesnt sound like plagiarism to me.
Did you read about the new evidence the author and others have since unearthed? It’s looking very much like Darwin plagiarized the work of others.
To: GodGunsGuts
Did you read about the new evidence the author and others have since unearthed? Its looking very much like Darwin plagiarized the work of others.
I read the article you posted not once, but twice and its not looking to me like anything but the authors pure conjecture and his preconceived notions no facts or references but just speculation.
"Darwin perpetuated one of the greatest crimes in the history of science". It concludes that Darwin plagiarizedAlfred Russel Wallace, deceived the world about the maturity of his own ideas before 1858, and, to satisfy his personal need for glory, failed to give credit to scholars who influenced his thinking...
Did you bother to read what I posted about the actual and well documented correspondences between these two men and their contemporaries both before and after publication? There was no argument or any discontent between these scientists except for in the vivid imaginations of the IDers some 150 years later.
41 posted on
08/11/2008 5:24:48 PM PDT by
Caramelgal
(Just a lump of organized protoplasm - braying at the stars :),)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson