Skip to comments.
Hillary's Surprise .... (DRat buyer's remorse)
New York Sun ^
| August 11, 2008
| Editorial
Posted on 08/11/2008 5:26:57 AM PDT by IrishMike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
08/11/2008 5:26:57 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
To: IrishMike
It is impossibly late for her to win the nomination. The democrats are not that stupid to take away the nomination from Obama at this stage and guarantee that they will lose each election for the next three decades.
2
posted on
08/11/2008 5:31:15 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(God Bless President Bush and our brave troops)
To: IrishMike
With HILLARY inside the Convention and “RECREATE ‘68” Outside, I can’t wait to see the CARNAGE!!
3
posted on
08/11/2008 5:32:34 AM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(I'll never vote for a LIBERAL ... even if they Do have an (R) after their name.)
To: IrishMike
Wants a big demonstration at the Convention for her to set her marker down that she’s ready to take over the Party the nano-second after Barak loses.
4
posted on
08/11/2008 5:38:01 AM PDT
by
AU72
To: jveritas
True. The Clintons are certainly hurting Obama, but an all out assault on winning the nomination would also destroy the Clintons politically. I look for then to continue to harm Obama subtlety and plan for a 2012 attack.
5
posted on
08/11/2008 5:38:40 AM PDT
by
MBB1984
To: gwilhelm56
“With HILLARY inside the Convention and RECREATE 68 Outside, I cant wait to see the CARNAGE!!”
....roger that!....we’re gonna have plenty of popcorn and Cokes laid in at our house....I wouldn’t be surprised if the TV ratings are the highest in years...I’m already nostalgic for the Clintons...nobody can generate Democrat chaos like they can.
To: STONEWALLS
** ... nobody can generate Democrat chaos like they can.”
I’m convinced ... They haven’t used all their DIRTY TRICKS, yet!!!
7
posted on
08/11/2008 5:45:03 AM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(I'll never vote for a LIBERAL ... even if they Do have an (R) after their name.)
To: IrishMike
There were a lot of votes that went for Obama...that were simply anti-Hillary votes.
It was the black vote that stunned the Clintons. She was told that she was married to the "Ace"...It was a typo.
8
posted on
08/11/2008 5:45:56 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
To: IrishMike
One of the disadvantages of the enemedia treating the Obamessiah like he is already president is that the sheeple may start to treat him like one before the election.
9
posted on
08/11/2008 5:46:25 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: AU72
Wants a big demonstration at the Convention for her to set her marker down that shes ready to take over the Party the nano-second after Barak loses.Yep. Whether she/Bill work behind the scenes to insure his defeat remains to be seen. But she's looking forward to 2012, which will only be possible with McCain in the WH.
10
posted on
08/11/2008 5:50:44 AM PDT
by
bcsco
(Obama: SPINciple in chief!)
To: IrishMike
Hillary lost because she was was not offering as much free loot to the democommie base.
To: IrishMike
So far the Obama help to the Clinton campaign debt amounts to $500,000. She can’t like that! Can she and Bill expect to make the kind of income they have been making with Obama as the head of the Democrat party? She may strike sooner than 2012.
To: gwilhelm56
Perhaps I'll appear some time overnight in Vienna; like a spring storm. ... -Adolf Hitler
13
posted on
08/11/2008 6:06:23 AM PDT
by
johnny7
("Duck I says... ")
To: gwilhelm56
“Im convinced ... They havent used all their DIRTY TRICKS, yet!!!”
....I agree and I’m looking foreward to seeing what they’ve got up their sleeve....and BTW, Bill is acting pissed these days with reporters...he feels he got a raw deal from the blacks when they threw the race card at him....he’s probably plotting some payback.
To: IrishMike
“mr. mccain is rougly running even in the polls.”
the only meaningful poll is the election. (that is if the democrats can stay away from the voting machines and issuing paper ballots to phantoms.)
15
posted on
08/11/2008 6:28:54 AM PDT
by
ripley
To: MBB1984
16
posted on
08/11/2008 6:38:15 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(God Bless President Bush and our brave troops)
To: IrishMike
Why were Superdelegates even created
... the titled nobility of the party ...
if not to exercise mature, calming judgment
at odds with the passion and frenzy of those who aren’t them?
To: IrishMike
Assuming if they did that, Clinton would fare better than Obama?
That’s a stretch even for imbecile Democrats.
To: IrishMike
Could Senator Clinton win the Democratic presidential nomination at the last minute by taking advantage of buyer's remorse among Democratic super-delegates who are dismayed by the performance of Senator Obama's campaign so far?
IMHO ...Yup!
19
posted on
08/11/2008 6:52:14 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: IrishMike
It’s too late for the D’s to nominate Hillary. If Obama loses big enough, it may not only secure her nomination for next time, but permanently curtail the influence of the hard left in the party. Not only Hillary will be back, but the DLC as well.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson