I go hoarse telling people here that they advance the Sex Positive agenda pushing for an end to moral judgments over sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, speices, or number of partner(s).
They oppose abstinence because they see sexual pleasure as a birthright that should be enjoyed at every age. They don’t oppose it because “it doesn’t work” (despite what they may tell some audiences), they oppose it because they find it to be an unhealthy supression of sexual desire (which sex positive proponents WILL tell some other audiences).
Why aren’t they up for morals charges for “corrupting a minor”?
And why aren’t the online retailers who sell dildos to underage teens prosecuted? The girls don’t need a toy to masturbate but they likely are using them. But then that is cracking down on those who “consent” (even though they are under the age of consent).
Excellent points. I do agree.
No joke serious question. How are these girls paying for these? Are they using mommy and daddy's credit card? Cause I gotta tell you if my wife saw something like that on our credit card bill, there had batter be a darn good reason.
That creepy middle aged guy in the videos will do more to discourage teen sex than anything we can do. :-)