Skip to comments.
War in Georgia: Yawns and Kneejerks in America
Discovery Institute ^
| 8/8/08
| Charles Ganske
Posted on 08/09/2008 2:20:37 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
The Discovery Institute ("Junk science - it's not just for liberals anymore") supports Russia's war on Georgia. Do they have proof that Stalin and dinosaurs lived at the same time
To: BlazingArizona
No protests in European streets over this yet...I think it’s still late 2004 or 05 over there. It will take years to remove “It’s Bushes Fault for Everything” from their minds.
2
posted on
08/09/2008 2:27:18 PM PDT
by
Coffee200am
("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears...%99"/s)
To: BlazingArizona
He does have a good point. If we insist on expanding NATO to Russia's borders, Russia can re-establish its military presence in Cuba and expand it to Venezuela. When it comes to invading each other's backyard, two can play the game. That's why our government is contenting itself with rhetorical support for Georgia. Russia is defending its national interests - the same as any other nation and these include its interests in the Caucasus.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
3
posted on
08/09/2008 2:28:26 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: BlazingArizona
It’s interesting how in all these articles Russian soldiers are continually referred to as ‘peacekeepers’. Of course, it’s part of a soldiers job to keep the peace, I just find it interesting how such subtle uses of language are used to reinforce a particular viewpoint - in this case to mask the idea that Russia is in this case acting aggressively.
4
posted on
08/09/2008 2:32:33 PM PDT
by
eclecticEel
(men who believe deeply in something, even wrong, usually triumph over men who believe in nothing)
To: BlazingArizona
“Nevermind that it was the Georgian army which launched the offensive that ignited the present round of fighting,”
OH Really???? Is that what the Russians are telling you, Mr. Ganske?
5
posted on
08/09/2008 2:33:40 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
(Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists)
To: BlazingArizona
As I learn more, it is clear that Russia is the aggressor and is in the wrong here. Russia is now bombing civilians in towns and cities throught Georgia. Russia isn’t looking to back Georgia off, Putin is looking to conquer Georgia by force of arms.
Scary.
6
posted on
08/09/2008 2:38:49 PM PDT
by
piytar
To: nuconvert
That is what the liberal media is claiming. Myself, I believe it takes two to tango. May they both loose....
7
posted on
08/09/2008 2:39:53 PM PDT
by
BullDog108
(A Smith & Wesson beats four aces)
To: BlazingArizona
After the U.S. and NATO countries recognized the independence of Kosovo in early 2008, the South Ossetians and Abkhazians decided they could also declare their independence from Georgia, which has sparked the recent round of fighting. I found this one bit of wisdom in the article...the rest is not so good...
8
posted on
08/09/2008 2:41:00 PM PDT
by
Bobalu
(If you don't want people pointing out your flaws, maybe you should work on not having any)
To: piytar
throught = throughout PIMF/posting from a phone
9
posted on
08/09/2008 2:47:36 PM PDT
by
piytar
To: nuconvert
Yeah, I find that pretty hilarious too. Does Ganske work for the NYT?
10
posted on
08/09/2008 2:51:51 PM PDT
by
jim35
("...when the lion and the lamb lie down together, ...we'd better damn sure be the lion")
To: nuconvert
The fact that Georgia launched an offensive into South Ossetia is not denied by anyone, not even Georgia itself.
To: nuconvert; eclecticEel
From other posts I've read Russia sent a contingent of troops into South Osseta to stir up trouble. They issued Russian passports to lots of people in order to claim those people were Russian citizens and then called their trouble makers Peacekeepers who were protecting these “Russian Citizens”. That is so much like the Communists MO as to be believable. Their true purpose is to bring Georgia back into the Communists fold.
The ruse of dissolving the USSR and ending Communism had two purposes - 1) to abandon the failed economic system of Communism and adopt a successful system, one they call Capitalism, while the leaders maintain their positions of power by claiming all the plums of the economy as their own, and 2) to gain more power in the UN by having each of the old republics admitted to the UN, giving them many votes instead of one.
However, they didn't intend for these newly “free” republics to take their independence seriously. Now they are trying to get them all back into the Communists fold and under Putin's thumb.
Russia has also gained power over Europe by furnish all Europe's natural gas under long term contracts. The pipeline from the Caspian Sea, multi-state owned, runs through Georgia and is a competitor to Gasprom and threat to Russian dominance. All of that is in play here.
12
posted on
08/09/2008 2:56:31 PM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
To: Decombobulator
“The fact that Georgia launched an offensive into South Ossetia is not denied by anyone, not even Georgia itself.”
Oh Really? Well, you’ll have to tell that to Georgia’s Pres. Saakashvili, cuz apparently he has a different take on it than you and others.
Georgia responded defensively after it was attacked.
13
posted on
08/09/2008 2:57:35 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
(Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
Yup, that’s my take, too.
14
posted on
08/09/2008 2:58:34 PM PDT
by
piytar
To: BlazingArizona
Russian Blog. Nough said.
15
posted on
08/09/2008 2:59:48 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(In loving memory of a lost FRiend YaYa123.)
To: goldstategop
If we insist on expanding NATO to Russia's borders, Russia can re-establish its military presence in Cuba and expand it to Venezuela. Notice how Russia is doing this anyway - and has been ever since it started propping up Cuba as an outpost of revolution.
To: eclecticEel
Are you surprised? Read some old Soviet manuals on war and you’ll find that they had an interesting definition of peace. Generally, they defined it as other people doing what the Soviets told them to do. It’s an attitude that predates the Bolshevicks and continues today.
17
posted on
08/09/2008 3:12:02 PM PDT
by
LenS
To: LenS
... an interesting definition of peace. Generally, they defined it as other people doing what the Soviets told them to do. It's an attitude that predates the Bolshevicks and continues today The Democrats call it Partisanship.
18
posted on
08/09/2008 3:17:23 PM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
To: BlazingArizona
19
posted on
08/09/2008 3:19:22 PM PDT
by
Tax Government
(Taxpayers are to democrats as chickens are to Col. Sanders)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
20
posted on
08/09/2008 3:49:08 PM PDT
by
dr_who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson