WIJG:Let's just say its a relevant issue - given that (quite arguably ;>) YOU are trying to persuade the "wacky RIGHT" to vote for YOUR candidate, on the basis that YOU say he/she/it can WIN the election. Numbers count, sport. If not, why do you need my vote?
What in the heck are you talking about? And why the caps? The shouting? Chill. My question was that it wasn't germane to the discussion who had more wackys....us or them.
Furthermore, if you've followed the thread conversation, I've made it clear...when it comes to seeing Obama lose...I'm thrilled to see a strategy that will counter the 'lost' conservative vote and make it a non-factor.
McCain choosing Lieberman is marketing and politcal genius, IMO. Whoever thought of that is the new Atwater. The new star.
There sure won't be any Florida recount....that's for sure. And Connecticut goes red.
You'll see...the abstainers won't hurt McCain. Maybe some of the other close races some like myself, forget about.
But as was pointed out to me the unhappy conservative will be courted in 2010 once again. So we can all hug again.
LOL!!!
My question was that it wasn't germane to the discussion who had more wackys....us or them.
(So long as you define the "wackys?" ;>)
I'm thrilled to see a strategy that will counter the 'lost' conservative vote and make it a non-factor.
Considering McCaine's amnesty proposal - does that include winning the 'illegal alien vote?' Exchanging a few 'conservative' votes for many more 'illegal alien' votes might be a winning strategy for a candidate.
;>)
McCain choosing Lieberman is marketing and politcal genius, IMO.
Oh, you betcha - so long as the 'Independents' who vote for McCaine can replace all of the 'Republicans' who stay home as a result. Of course, if you were right, the first Bush would have been elected to a second term.
;>)
Whoever thought of that is the new Atwater. The new star.
Oh, give me a break. A complete lack of principle, in pursuit of an electoral victory, is pure 'Clinton' - and that's exactly what you're pushing here.
You'll see...the abstainers won't hurt McCain.
Oh, I'm sure you're right - after all, "WHERE ELSE CAN THEY GO?"
;>)