Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoftballMominVA
When the units were emptied, the owners who previously thought they were doing such a grand thing, we greeted with destroyed walls, appliances pulled out and just gone, carpet matted with urine and various other bodily fluids from both man and animal, a conspicuous lack of toilets. (Who steals toilets? Honestly)

Yeah, but under the rules for section 8 housing the GOVERNMENT pays for any damage to the property by the tenants. So for the landlord it's a no lose proposition. Guaranteed rent, and a government rehab when the POS move out.
8 posted on 08/09/2008 5:17:46 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Kozak
Yeah, but under the rules for section 8 housing the GOVERNMENT pays for any damage to the property by the tenants. So for the landlord it's a no lose proposition. Guaranteed rent, and a government rehab when the POS move out.

Which creates an incentive for the landlord of an old apartment in need of renovations, to rent to destructive Section 8 tenants. He then gets a government-paid renovation when they move out

10 posted on 08/09/2008 5:24:56 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

The government pays the absolute MINIMUM for the replacement, not the true value. It was and is a losing proposition for someone who wants their house to stay in good condition


11 posted on 08/09/2008 5:25:59 AM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

I have a friend who rented to section 8 tenants. They did over 50,000 in damage to a 150,000 unit (basically he had to take everything to the studs and start over)
I am not aware he got one dime from the government to help pay for the damage.


13 posted on 08/09/2008 5:29:05 AM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

This is not quite true. I used to rent to S-8 tenants and I assure you the government does not pay for the repairs.


18 posted on 08/09/2008 5:39:32 AM PDT by threeoeight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak

Section 8 used to be a better deal for landlords because the rent check went right to the landlord, and the government did pay for most of what was damaged. Now, neither is true and I would not touch Section 8.


35 posted on 08/09/2008 6:32:11 AM PDT by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Kozak
So for the landlord it's a no lose proposition.

It becomes a problem in apartments when the few S-8 tenants cause an exodus of the law-abiding, peaceful tenants.

This happened to a co-worker of mine. He lived in a nice, safe apartment complex. It only took ONE family to change everything. A single mother and her teenage sons on S-8 moved into a unit and overnight the apartment complex became Thug Central when her sons' gang-banger homies all started hanging around. Robberies started happening, car break-ins, fights, loud music, intimidating the other residents, etc. My co-worker was robbed at gunpoint when he went out to his patio to smoke a cigarette!

Eventually, all the good tenants moved out and the landlord found himself with a 50% vacancy rate. He couldn't give units away.

47 posted on 08/09/2008 12:13:59 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson