To: hocndoc; neverdem; MHGinTN; cpforlife.org; Coleus; weegee; Mr. Silverback; Brad's Gramma; metmom
I would have never guessed that the attack on physician's conscience rights would somehow become a gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgendered/transexual/pea-green-with-lavender-stripes issue, although I could have foreseen the involvement of "Compassionate Choices" and other pushers of intentional physician killing.
In case I've goofed with the Washington Post quote, there's more on the background at my blog, LifeEthics, under key word, "conscience."
2 posted on
08/09/2008 2:50:10 AM PDT by
hocndoc
(http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
To: Admin Moderator
I used the right link, but the wrong newspaper title in my source above. Could you change that to the Washington Post?
3 posted on
08/09/2008 3:04:11 AM PDT by
hocndoc
(http://www.LifeEthics.org (I have a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
To: hocndoc
"According to lawyers Charo and Tucker, I can go up to any MD or DO and demand that he or she write the prescription [For a lethal amount of barbituate]." Ah yes, the term choice is applied up until the dead-souls have transformed the society into their brand of twisted choice, then it is no longer permitted that someone choose what is not dictated by the ghouls. There is an illness, a deadly disease in fact, at work, but it is spiritual and the ghouls have no medicine to treat it that they will accept, and they sure as Hell aren't going to acknowledge God's sovereignty and be guided by what He says.
13 posted on
08/09/2008 6:33:39 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson