A following? I’m only interested in getting at the truth about Obama possibly being a crack user and purchaser in recent times...you should care about it too.
As to ‘discredited’...Sinclair has not been. He passed the polygraph, but widely disseminated misinformation broadcast the opposite. Seems to be a monumental coverup.
And folks like you ridiculing efforts to unearth the truth seem to part the strategy, I’m afraid.
Do your due diligence please.
in the Edwards affair, there’s a baby. The baby has DNA. Remember the stain on Monica’s blue dress? Without it, that story would have gone nowhere, just like all the rest of these things that come up. Kitty Kelly had a whole lot of prostitutes in Texas lined up saying what they’d done with George Bush, but that never went anywhere because it was only “he said, she said” at worst. Larry Sinclair has zero chance of producing any kind of evidence. I’m betting the Larry Sinclair posting at FR is an imposter trying to set FR up for a black-eye in the press.
A following? I’m only interested in getting at the truth about Obama possibly being a crack user and purchaser in recent times...you should care about it too.
“As to ‘discredited’...Sinclair has not been. He passed the polygraph, but widely disseminated misinformation broadcast the opposite. Seems to be a monumental coverup.
And folks like you ridiculing efforts to unearth the truth seem to part the strategy, I’m afraid.
Do your due diligence please.”
I agree. I think there’s something to all this- but I guess that’s just you and me and pissant. LOL
.