Posted on 08/08/2008 6:21:37 PM PDT by dascallie
I wonder if Larry was the only one?
I can’t wait until FR starts getting described as the “site where discredited pervert has a following” with WashingtonPost.com and the genius Danielle from Princeton continuing the smear against FR.
So is this why Obama left for Hawaii? Is he hiding??
He went to get his birth certificate.
Hahahaha This is soooooo funny. Come on! No one is going to believe this crap unless this guy has a video of this f*ckfest.
Let the tape exist and make it an October surprise lol.
A following? I’m only interested in getting at the truth about Obama possibly being a crack user and purchaser in recent times...you should care about it too.
As to ‘discredited’...Sinclair has not been. He passed the polygraph, but widely disseminated misinformation broadcast the opposite. Seems to be a monumental coverup.
And folks like you ridiculing efforts to unearth the truth seem to part the strategy, I’m afraid.
Do your due diligence please.
After Obama had sex with Larry Sinclair, it was such a negative experience, that he never again dabbled with men again.
Look at those kids faces. They must be sitting there in Reverend Wright’s Hate Church and listening to the hate sermon.
Like another normal day at the office.
I was say definitely yes. His trip to Hawaii seemed strange to me, especially when time during a campaign is precious.
Thank G-d for the Enquirer...........and I say this totally sincerely. It always seems to have the true line..........
was s/b would
in the Edwards affair, there’s a baby. The baby has DNA. Remember the stain on Monica’s blue dress? Without it, that story would have gone nowhere, just like all the rest of these things that come up. Kitty Kelly had a whole lot of prostitutes in Texas lined up saying what they’d done with George Bush, but that never went anywhere because it was only “he said, she said” at worst. Larry Sinclair has zero chance of producing any kind of evidence. I’m betting the Larry Sinclair posting at FR is an imposter trying to set FR up for a black-eye in the press.
I’ll bet dollars to donuts Michelle knows he “swings both ways” as we used to say in high school but wanted to be married to him anyway cos of his stellar “future”
Honestly, I don’t think the Enquirer will break anything simply because they are VERY unlikely to get the kind of damning evidence they got on Edwards. It’s unlikely Obama is going to go visit Larry and get caught.
There is also the fact that the Enquirer tends to require their sources to pass lie detector tests unless they have some VERY solid evidence (video, photos etc.), and I doubt Larry will submit to another one.
Unless I'm wrong, The Globe is also part of the Enquirer and they're the ones who have been running cover stories it seems forever on the Bushes and how they will be divorcing after he leaves office, his "drinking", and his affairs with Condie. I agree the Enquirer has certainly broken some huge stories, but I wonder how much credibility is challenged when it comes to their offshoot The Globe.
Obama said, “I tried it once, but I didn’t swal...I mean inhale”.
You, sir, have retired the Sherlock Holmes trophy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.