If he wants to put it to rest then he needs to do the paternity test.
He said it happened in 2006, and he told his wife then that he did it but he didn’t love her.
What a POS...
No, to put it to rest I’ll bet he wrote a check and forced her to sign a piece of paper.
Doesn’t the National Enquirer have recent photos of him visiting the woman “he doesn’t love” and the child that “isn’t his”?
It’s crazy how he tries to soften the blow of all this news by saying:
1. He had the affair with her, but the baby isn’t his. So then that’s ok to have the extramarital affair because he’s not the father of an out of wedlock baby?
2. He had the affair with her, but says he doesn’t love her. So then that’s ok to have the extramarital affair if it’s all about lust and using somebody?
3. He had the affair with her, but says it happened when his wife’s cancer was in remission. So then that’s ok, because he wasn’t neglecting his sick wife to go be with this other woman?
Yea, I always get caught late at night sneaking into the hotel room of a woman I had an affair with.. but am not any more... who has a very young child too.
“I did not have sex with that woman... oh wait, I did.. but I did not impregnate that woman...”
Now, lets recap, this is the guy who was going to fight on, in spite of the fact his wifes cancer had returned?
Anyone following this nonsense?
How could he he do that to his wife and kids. Especially considering her condition. I feel sorry for the kids and Ms. Edwards. God bless the family. And lets not be too nasty on this this folks. Its terrible and wrong, but these kids have to live with this.
Here they damn Edwards and Clinton. On the other side's sites they damn Gingrich and Hyde. Both sides are full of hypocrites and you know what else.
Yep, and if it was 2006, why is he visiting her now?
Yep, and if it was 2006, why is he visiting her now?
He would make a good running mate for Obama.
He didn’t love either of them, just himself. Elizabeth is likely only staying w/him for their kids.