Please remember that this nation's founders used anonymous aliases in the fierce discussions that took place when the Constitution was ratified. "Doctor" Krawetz obviously has no respect for that tradition. Instead Krawetz decided he'd hit on some man.
Krawetz whacked Fink out of the blue. It was nasty, it was mean. Good people should have ZERO respect for such a hacker.
I'm going to stick with my read on the issue then -- four weeks ago. IMO, Krawetz does not know who Techdude is, and Krawetz still doesn't know whether Techdude was or was not Fink. Nor has Krawetz debunked anything.
Kevmo, I’m four weeks ahead of you.
***Like I said, I went on vacation during that time.
picked him at random (that is Krawetz did NOT contact Fink first)
***I don’t think this was random on Krawetz’s part.
and, imo, Kravetz suggested albeit indirectly that people harass Fink.
***That is despicable, and in light of his other comments, what you say is probably well supported.
Please remember that this nation’s founders used anonymous aliases in the fierce discussions that took place when the Constitution was ratified.
***I didn’t know that. You’re a pretty fart smeller...er I mean smart feller. ;-)
Krawetz whacked Fink out of the blue.
***I don’t understand what that means. Earlier you said it was random, and here you say out of the blue. Krawetz figured out, based upon what Techdude was saying, that Fink’s resume matched Techdude and started hammering away at Fink. Now, I agree that this is mean/despicable/nasty/liberal/whatever, but it does not appear to be random/out of the blue. What do you mean?
I’m going to stick with my read on the issue then
***That’s okay, but my confidence is starting to dwindle. The whole issue has become about experts sniping at eachother and I can’t decipher much of the forensic analysis. I encourage anyone who can do damage to Obama on this brouhaha. In particular, the most telling piece of evidence is the fact that Obama hasn’t released a paper copy of the document to whomever asks, just like John McCain has done. That would have made this whole thing go away for Obama, and now that the issue is causing real political damage, that’s evidence enough for me to know there’s something there. Basically, there’s blood in the water.
Nor has Krawetz debunked anything.
***Perhaps you could start a thread here on Free Republic that walks through Krawetz’s analysis and why you think he hasn’t debunked anything. Keep it simple enough for newbies to understand because there are thousands each day that are becoming aware of this issue and they get lost immediately in all the techogeekspeak.