Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw

I would assume ‘natural born’ to be considered a necessary (for purposes of establishing a standard) but not in itself sufficient basis for establishing such an allegiance—but it is of course the one in the Constitution.

[Though we all know immigrants with as great or greater an allegiance to this country as many native (natural born) citizens.]


152 posted on 08/08/2008 8:33:06 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

We are each and all born into a world with natural loyalties — at birth — to parents and to place. Those loyalties can be at odds. “Natural Born” means those circumstances of birth where the born allegiance is not at odds. For example a child of American’s on temporary travel abroad would have no natural allegiance to France, or Kenya — his or her allegiance would be to the permanent residence of his parents and where the child grows up.


154 posted on 08/08/2008 8:42:48 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson