Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker
At least one thing argues that the original intent was to exclude foreign born American nationals from high office.

It wasn't until 1790 that they passed a law exempting their own children and children of other members of "the club"'s (e.g. children of diplomats stationed abroad) from the strict requirement of US soil birth.

Note that this is NOT a constitutional amendment.

The original Constitution is intact, and still the supreme law of the land.

141 posted on 08/08/2008 7:24:54 AM PDT by null and void (Barack Obama - International Man of Mystery...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: null and void; bvw

You’ve both read more on this than I, but the little I’ve seen of Blackstone suggests that ‘natural born’ referred to those who would be classified as citizens by birth, because it is assumed that they would have been born into a natural allegiance to the state, and what has changed over time in the US is who legally would be so classified.

The logic would have gone from ‘if A, then B and if B, then C’ to ‘if A1, then B and if B, then C’.


146 posted on 08/08/2008 7:57:56 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson