Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'2 US aircraft carriers headed for Gulf'
Jerusalem Post ^ | 8/7/2008 | Adam Gonn

Posted on 08/07/2008 3:08:17 PM PDT by mojito

Two additional United States naval aircraft carriers are heading to the Gulf and the Red Sea, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper Kuwait Times.

Kuwait began finalizing its "emergency war plan" on being told the vessels were bound for the region.

The US Navy would neither confirm nor deny that carriers were en route. US Fifth Fleet Combined Maritime Command located in Bahrain said it could not comment due to what a spokesman termed "force-protection policy."

While the Kuwaiti daily did not name the ships it believed were heading for the Middle East, The Media Line's defense analyst said they could be the USS Theodore Roosevelt and the USS Ronald Reagan.

Within the last month, the Roosevelt completed an exercise along the US east coast focusing on communication among navies of different countries. It has since been declared ready for operational duties. The Reagan, currently with the Seventh Fleet, had just set sail from Japan.

The Seventh Fleet area of operation stretches from the East Coast of Africa to the International Date Line.

Meanwhile, the Arabic news agency Moheet reported at the end of July that an unnamed American destroyer, accompanied by two Israeli naval vessels traveled through the Suez Canal from the Mediterranean. A week earlier, a US nuclear submarine accompanied by a destroyer and a supply ship moved into the Mediterranean, according to Moheet.

Currently there are two US naval battle groups operating in the Gulf: one is an aircraft carrier group, led by the USS Abraham Lincoln, which carries some 65 fighter aircraft. The other group is headed by the USS Peleliu which maintains a variety of planes and strike helicopters.

The ship movements coincide with the latest downturn in relations between Washington and Teheran. The US and Iran are at odds over Iran's nuclear program, which the Bush administration claims is aimed at producing material for nuclear weapons; however, Teheran argues it is only for power generation.

Kuwait, like other Arab countries in the Gulf, fears it will be caught in the middle should the US decide to launch an air strike against Iran if negotiations fail. The Kuwaitis are finalizing details of their security, humanitarian and vital services, the newspaper reported.

The six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) - Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Oman - lie just across the Gulf from Iran. Generals in the Iranian military have repeatedly warned that American interests in the region would be targeted if Iran is subjected to any military strike by the US or its Western allies.

Bahrain hosts the US Fifth Fleet, while there is a sizeable American base in Qatar. It is assumed the US also has military personnel in the other Gulf states, The Media Line's defense analyst said.

Iran is thought to have intelligence operatives working in the GCC states, according to Dubai-based military analysts.

The standoff between the US and Iran has left the Arab nations' political leaders in something of a bind, as they were being used as pawns by Washington and Teheran, according to The Media Line analyst.

Iran has offered them economic and industrial sweeteners, while the US is boosting their defense capabilities. US President George W. Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have paid visits to the GCC states in a bid to win their support.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; iran; persiangulf; shipmovement; unitedstatesnavy; ussronaldreagan; usstheodoreroosevelt
Interesting development.
1 posted on 08/07/2008 3:08:18 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojito

Shhhh! Ix nay on the bombing ay...


2 posted on 08/07/2008 3:14:04 PM PDT by John123 (Obambi said that he has been in 57 states. I will now light myself on fire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

“accompanied by two Israeli naval vessels traveled through the Suez Canal ...”

Hmm. Israeli vessels? Thats also an interesting development (unless they got a three-fer rate from the
canal company).


3 posted on 08/07/2008 3:16:12 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
With these periodic deployments, Iran doesn't know whether to sh_t or get off the pot. If a strike does come, it will still be a surprise...

Mike

4 posted on 08/07/2008 3:17:18 PM PDT by MichaelP (The Big Picture IS important!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John123
"...that's is-nay on the ombing-bay."

Pig-Latin is your friend, earn it-lay, use it-ay, ove-it-lay.
5 posted on 08/07/2008 3:20:43 PM PDT by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

err...let me re-state that...ix-nay on the ombing-bay.


6 posted on 08/07/2008 3:22:05 PM PDT by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland
Pig-Latin

Please excuse me... I suck at foreign languages...

7 posted on 08/07/2008 3:22:54 PM PDT by John123 (Obambi said that he has been in 57 states. I will now light myself on fire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojito

I predict the window of opportunity: After the 2008 elections while President Bush is still in office. The Israelis will hold their 2008 primary September 17th.

I predict the Israelis will make their move after their new prime minister is elected.

Does anyone know when their general elections is set?


8 posted on 08/07/2008 3:27:06 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

The US would do well to seize the Iranian side of Hormuz.


9 posted on 08/07/2008 3:30:41 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP

How long do carrier groups usually stay deployed in that area?


10 posted on 08/07/2008 3:34:10 PM PDT by Dagny&Hank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John123

Bless you my son. You are forgiven. Ego absolvo te.


11 posted on 08/07/2008 3:36:10 PM PDT by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dagny&Hank

6 months had been standard before 2003 but in recent years the tours of Carrier Battle Groups have often added a few months, IIRC.


12 posted on 08/07/2008 3:42:55 PM PDT by Enchante (If oil was botox then Nancy Pelosi would have us drilling everywhere!!! (hat tip, STARWISE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

I fear dangerous times ahead.
My prayers for the sailors and the airmen.


13 posted on 08/07/2008 3:45:14 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

ere Whey Id ou ya earn La oo Ta eak Spay ig Pay atin Lay ? parently Aye ot Ney ere Whey Eye earn La id Dey !


14 posted on 08/07/2008 3:54:54 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mojito
September 2008. Carrier Strike Groups are racing toward Iran before its messianic leader can initiate the “End of Days.” As tensions mount.... Right on schedule, per this novel— http://anonymoussedition.com/
15 posted on 08/07/2008 3:55:33 PM PDT by Shqipo (Palin for Veep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Add yet two more carrier groups in early November and “Let’s Roll!”


16 posted on 08/07/2008 4:32:41 PM PDT by Solitar ("My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them." -- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

The Reagan recently left Sasebo, Japan. It is supposed to stay within 7th fleet waters, which conveniently covers parts of the Indian Ocean. Where it is currently headed for sure, no one knows. The Roosevelt is supposedly conducting training off the Atlantic Coast of the US. It will soon depart for a scheduled deployment, probably to replace the Lincoln, currently in 5th fleet AOR. There is nothing here that truly indicates a rush to attack Iran. However, any attack on Iran would likely occur at switchover between two already planned deployments, which will conveniently happen probably in September/October.

One item of interest is that the two deployed squadrons with f-18f fighters with the new AESA radars are vfa-213, part of the Roosevelt carrier wing, and vfa-22, part of the Reagan carrier wing. In addition, Reagan carries EA-6b planes with the latest electronic warfare doodads (ICAP III) that are 10 times as good at a number of tasks as previous EA-6bs.


17 posted on 08/07/2008 4:37:57 PM PDT by burster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: burster

Thanks for those clarifications.


18 posted on 08/07/2008 4:42:41 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mojito

BTTT


19 posted on 08/08/2008 6:29:29 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson