Some survivors of the attacks and members of Congress said they were persuaded by the evidence against Dr. Ivins, laid out in hundreds of pages of applications for search warrants unsealed for the first time. But some independent scientists, friends and colleagues of Dr. Ivins remained skeptical, noting that officials admitted that more than 100 people had access to the supply of anthrax that matched the powder in the letters.
Even assuming that Ivins was the lone perp-
When’s the FBI going to get around to explaining how the head of an active terrorist cell, Ali A Timimi, could get past the background check?
And what is their explanation for all the circumstantial evidence that contradicts the lone perp theory?
There are 800,000 postal workers in the first line of being "survivors of the attacks".
The only "survivors" they've talked to were family members of those who actually contracted anthrax, or those who survived that contraction.
Virtually none of the people who were simply "exposed" were invited for special briefings or interviews. None of the downstream people who could have been, and probably were exposed, were interviewed.
The FBI is so full of it in this case.