Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
National Enquirer is now MSM?..............

When the more common MSM refuses to look at a story, then the Enquirer seems to gain credibility with the people. (rolls eyes)

9 posted on 08/07/2008 10:41:25 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: theDentist

Everyone sees it at the checkout counter, even if they don’t buy it.

I believe National Enquirer is still controlled by the clintons, who bought up control of ll the supermarket rags after they broke the Danny Williams story and committed other insubordinate acts during his second term.


11 posted on 08/07/2008 10:47:42 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: theDentist

The difference between the National Enquirer and the New York Times is that when the National Enquirer runs a story about a politician having an affair, I believe them.

But seriously, I don’t like their selection of topics, but how often does the Enquirer get something wrong?


27 posted on 08/07/2008 11:08:36 AM PDT by TennesseeProfessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson