Where do you get that I said that medical treatment for disease was wrong? That's quite a leap from a statement that the vaccine will lull people into a false sense of security.
That's already happening judging from comments made by politicians etc.; it's not just an implication. One politician who is eager to force this on others was bragging that now she doesn't have to worry about her daughter getting cervical cancer now that she got her vaccine.
Pol has plan to nix cervical cancer
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782347/posts
"This is a revolutionary opportunity to eradicate a disease that kills many, many women. As a mom, I'm grateful my daughter will not have to fear having cervical cancer," said Paulin, whose 18-year-old daughter just received her first shot.
So, as a doctor, you've never encountered the mindset that now that there's treatment for something, people don't feel obligated to be more conscientious about preventing it or taking better care of themselves?
In searching for that thread, I did a keyword search for *hpv* and was appalled at the number of threads detailing the deaths and side-effects connected with this vaccine. There's so much outrage at the number of kids who contracted polio from the vaccine when it was something like one in a million and here we have reports of deaths and other serious side effects with this new vaccine and those opposed to the risk girls who get the vaccine are faced with are faced with so much derision.
This vaccine is supposed to prevent cancer deaths. If people are dying from this, that's defeating the whole purpose of the vaccine; that is to prevent deaths.
The number of threads has nothing to do with the number of actual injuries and do not give any credence to the stories. Someone up thread noted that the VAERs system is uncontrolled and purely anecdotal. “I heard that someone my sister knew heard. . .”