Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boone Doggle
Wall Street Journal ^ | August 6, 2008 | HOLMAN W. JENKINS, JR.

Posted on 08/06/2008 8:47:46 AM PDT by djsherin

Boone Pickens may be a fine man, and has played a colorful and useful role on the American stage for decades. But his "energy plan," which he's spending a fortune to promote on cable TV, is not a plan.

Asserting that something would be good to do is not "a plan." Saying how to do it is "a plan." By this standard, what the legendary oil man is devoting $58 million to pitch hardly amounts to a decent slogan.

He would replace natural gas in electricity production with wind, and use the natural gas to power cars. He fails to mention any practical theory of how to get there -- that would really be "a plan." Instead, he relies on the deus ex machina of Congress, waving a legislative wand to make people do things they would choose not to do, given the extravagant and unjustified costs involved.

Having reasons is not "a plan" either, but Mr. Pickens has his reasons. He says we spend $700 billion a year on foreign oil, which he calls a "transfer of wealth." But exchanging money for oil at the market price is an exchange of things of equal value. If we didn't value their oil more than our dollars, we wouldn't participate in such a bargain.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boonepickens; drilling; energy; enviroprofiteering; oil; windenergy; windfarms; windpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/06/2008 8:47:46 AM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: djsherin
By this standard, what the legendary oil man is devoting $58 million to pitch hardly amounts to a decent slogan.

If his "plan" had any real chance of success, he'd be spending the $58 million gathering investors, not running a PR campaign.

2 posted on 08/06/2008 8:54:05 AM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

‘Tis a constant amusement to watch someone who’s successful in business try to actually create something....especially when that “something” involves science. The only thing more amusing is to watch a politician dabble in science. Prime example” the Goracle.


3 posted on 08/06/2008 8:55:44 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Great article. I'm glad to see the Wall Street Journal finally expose Pickens. It could have gone deeper, though. Rather than drill, Pickens proposes 142,000 giant wind turbines across the prairie. But as for drilling for domestic oil, he's silent. Here's my favorite line:

As Mr. Pickens says, we can't drill our way out of the dilemmas of living in the world.

Who does that remind you of?

4 posted on 08/06/2008 8:57:28 AM PDT by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

Maybe Boone “IS” as dumb as he looks...


5 posted on 08/06/2008 9:04:15 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher
Who does that remind you of?

First time I saw the Pickens ad, I immeduiately thought of Ross Perot. Perot got into the Presidential race only because his company would have made huge profits processing claims associated with the Clinton national health care scheme.

Pickens is only interested in wind and solar power because the government subsidies would make him far more wealthy than than he has already become.

I was on a plane with a rep for a wind turbine rep and he acknowledged that wind power is viable only because of tax incentives. Without them, no one would be interested in buying his company's wind turbines.

6 posted on 08/06/2008 9:09:41 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Maybe. But maybe he`s gambling. Not much to lose either. The more inefficient the energy producing source, the more the socialist Washington DC subsidizes it:

Dept of energy per Megawatt hour of power generation.
Coal: $0.44. Nuclear: $1.59. Big Oil: $0.25. Hydroelectric: $0.67. WIND: $23.37. SOLAR: $24.34.


7 posted on 08/06/2008 9:23:58 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Keep thinking ole TBP is dumb as a box of hammers and before long he will not only have the shirt off your back but will have your pants and underwear.


8 posted on 08/06/2008 9:44:54 AM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trad_anglican
If his "plan" had any real chance of success, he'd be spending the $58 million gathering investors,

That's precisely what he's doing.

9 posted on 08/06/2008 9:49:01 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: biff

Maybe I should mail him a set of my underwear..


10 posted on 08/06/2008 9:54:02 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

I’ve watch the commercials and at first thought that he must have something special to say, but at the end of the first one the background was filled with wind turbines - Hmmmm.....I thought, has T. Boone gone south on us?

Perhaps someone should appoint someone to manage his money?


11 posted on 08/06/2008 9:54:18 AM PDT by unique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snardius
That's precisely what he's doing.

I don't think so. The kind of investors he would need are not the kind that would respond to his commercials.

12 posted on 08/06/2008 9:55:31 AM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
I don't think so... I think he's a smart cookie, he's just more focused on making money for himself than solving problems for the rest of us.

Not that you can blame him for it. He doesn't work for us.

13 posted on 08/06/2008 9:57:11 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE - http://freenj.blogspot.com - RadioFree NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trad_anglican
The kind of investors he would need are not the kind that would respond to his commercials.

The kind of investors he needs are paying attention to how much traction his "plan" gets regarding public opinion. Once he's got the market for his product, the investors he needs will come.

14 posted on 08/06/2008 10:06:57 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
he's just more focused on making money for himself than solving problems for the rest of us.

I think Boone "I've been an oilman all my life" Pickens is simply practicing the old adage...When you're being run out of town, get out in front and make it look like a parade..."

15 posted on 08/06/2008 10:11:16 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: biff
Keep thinking ole TBP is dumb as a box of hammers and before long he will not only have the shirt off your back but will have your pants and underwear...

I call them good ol' boys.

16 posted on 08/06/2008 10:16:26 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops by accusing them of war crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
T Boone Pickens is only interested in money. He could care less about the climate. He made his money in oil and now that oil is out of fashion, like a good businessman, he goes to the next great line of services for mankind. I can't even imagine the taxpayer subsidies that he will get for his wind turbines as a new energy source. I expect that all the land he will get to lease from the government will be free and clear also.
17 posted on 08/06/2008 10:18:32 AM PDT by lucky american (We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

This could be good information for future arguments. Is there a source or link?


18 posted on 08/06/2008 10:23:14 AM PDT by Where is todays Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lucky american

I don’t understand why the government gets involved in everything. Why do we even have subsidies and rebates? They don’t work and they aren’t Constitutional and they’re socialistic in nature. But I agree, he’s in it for the money. I don’t know how efficient wind is but solar is around 25%. Personally I think as a business (assuming you have a flat enough roof with sun access) solar is a great idea but only because it’s making use of room that would have otherwise not been utilized.


19 posted on 08/06/2008 10:24:10 AM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Subsidies were meant for companies that had good ideas and no capital to bring their services or products to market. Now there are loans and giveaways to companies that can't compete. It started out as a helping hand and has turned into a taxpayer giveaway.
20 posted on 08/06/2008 10:31:58 AM PDT by lucky american (We cannot direct the wind but we can adjust the sails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson