[Romulus]

looking back with hindsight and applying modern attitudes to historical times.

A shallow and stupid argument.

Lots of responsible voices, including senior members of the US military, regarded the bombings as a war crime at the time.

[PurpleMan]

looking back with hindsight and applying modern attitudes to historical times.

“A shallow and stupid argument.”

Actually, that somthing that is continually done by historian filled with guilt for what their ancestory thought was the proper action decades and centuries before.

By your reasoning the founding fathers committed crimes against humanity by not outlawing slavery.

[mad_as_he$$]

"History cannot and must not be judged using the perspective of the rear view mirror."

Mad-as-he$$ circa 1997.

[Dumb_Ox]

American conservatives who opposed the atomic strikes, with more information here.

[ohioman]

“Lots of responsible voices, including senior members of the US military, regarded the bombings as a war crime at the time. “

Is that so? Can you back that up with quotes and sources from Sr. US Military members?

[Lurker]

senior members of the US military, regarded the bombings as a war crime at the time.

Name two.

L

[We Dare Defend Our Rights]

Sow the wind, reap the world wind.

Lots of men from Bataan and under these rows of white crosses across the Pacfic, don't think enough Atomic Bombs were dropped.

There is no such thing as a “responsible voice” against the bombing, only traitors.

[Repeal The 17th]

“Lots of responsible voices, including senior members of the US military, regarded the bombings as a war crime at the time.”
- - -
You have reached your maximum capacity of feces.