So did Hatfill if what they said about him (now known to be mostly if not entirely false) was taken at face value. If it is true that someone "seriously disturbed" can work his entire life at a biological warfare facility and pass all the background checks, then we have a lot bigger problem than a bit of corruption and incompetence at the FBI.
Personally, I still think it is far more likely that the al Qaeda spokesperson who supposedly worked a few feet away in the same lab was the culprit (the FBI apparently ruled him out because his father was an Iraqi diplomat, and we know the Iraqis weren't involved because it violates the postulate that the Iraqis weren't involved).
Ditto what you wrote. Doubtful that we will ever know the whole truth on this one. I don’t generally consider myself to be a conspiracy monger (but who does, really?), but there are just too many things that don’t add up at all about the whole anthrax issue.
“As far back as the year 2000, the respondent has actually attempted to murder several other people either through poisoning. He is a revenge killer. When he feels he that he has been slighted or has had ... especially towards women ... he plots and actually tries to carry out revenge killing. He has been forensically diagnosed by several top psychiatrists as a sociopathic homicidal killer.”
This whole statement I now believe has nothing to do with what she observed in him but what the FBI agents were telling her.
She probably felt privileged to hear it!
I wonder if the FBI will use her as the authority for the statement, rather than admit its true origin.
Do you have a link for this? Hadn't heard it. Thanks.