Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nicola_tesla

I wouldn’t call it blackmail when they’re holding trillions of dollars of paper they bought in good faith. Should they just suck it up and take a trillion dollar loss on what was touted as being among the most secure of investments?


8 posted on 08/04/2008 3:36:28 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: decimon

No, it wasn’t touted as the most secure of investments. Their prospectus - isn’t it quaint that anyone would actually read such a thing - explicitly they were NOT backed by the Federal Government. Thus FMN/FRE bonds paid a higher premium (interest) than Treasuries.

So now we’re compensating people (bondholders) who have already received a risk premium. Maybe they should give back to taxpayers that rate differential.

Heck, maybe they should just have stuck with Treasuries.


11 posted on 08/04/2008 3:53:08 PM PDT by nicola_tesla ("Life is Tough... It's Worse When You're Stupid".... John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson