Please, I know plenty about the case, I've read most of the trial transcripts, Ramos and Compean were their own worst witnesses. When a politician runs in front of a microphone you can bet that the only reason for it is to advance their own career. I got a huge chuckle out of your naiveness.
Of course certain things are admissible and certain things are not admissible, courts have rules, they apply to everyone, equally, for really good reasons.
There are some pols who are honest, trustworthy and decent, Rohrabacher and Hunter being two of them. Romos and Campeon may have been bad witnesses for themselves in your opinion however it is my opinion and that of many others that the trial was a done deal before it ever started. Good men were unjustly convicted and imprisoned. How you can be for an Illegal/drug mule and argue you are the know-it-all legal mind of the case is beyond me. It is my opinion you are not for law and order and/or justice, you are for license and corruption. You are a D.C. and D.F. kind of guy.
This will help you:
National Border Patrol Council » Blog Archive » NBPC Votes No ...
Click Here For Press Release. By Jerry Seper THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published April 23, 2007. The leaders of the U.S. Border Patrol’s rank-and-file agents have unanimously voted a ...
www.nbpc.net/?p=74