Posted on 08/04/2008 10:05:23 AM PDT by average american student
By Chuck Baldwin
According to numerous press reports, President George W. Bush plans to attend the opening ceremonies of the Summer Olympics in Beijing, China later this month. Bush said that it "would be an affront to the Chinese people" if he stayed away. Other world leaders, including Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain, are choosing to not attend the opening ceremonies in the communist country.
It is hard for this writer to laud President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, but in this case, even the socialist Roosevelt showed more integrity than our so-called "conservative" President, George W. Bush. When the 1936 Olympics were held in Berlin, Germany, President Roosevelt refused to attend those ceremonies for fear that his presence would give honor and prestige to the notorious Adolf Hitler. And so it would have. And, by the same token, when President Bush attends the opening ceremonies in China, he is giving honor and prestige to the bloody butchers of Beijing who have persecuted, tortured, and murdered multiplied thousands of the Chinese people since the communist regime took power in 1949.
President Bush said it would be an affront to the Chinese people if he did not attend the Olympics. Wrong. It would be an affront to the Red Chinese tyrants. And they deserve to be affronted! Instead, by attending the Olympic ceremonies, Bush is choosing to affront the hundreds of thousands of Chinese victims who have suffered brutality and barbarism at the hands of the very people Bush will be wining and dining with. Actually, by participating in the Beijing Olympics, President Bush is an affront to freedom-loving people everywhere.
For example, the Chinese government has already created profiles of thousands of foreign journalists ...
(Excerpt) Read more at stiffrightjab.com ...
Sure, not caring one way or the other whether Bush goes to the Olympics is an emotional response. Got it.
:::rolls eyes:::
No, making up excuses like "He's going to honor the athletes" is what I meant.
No, I didn't say that at all. You're being disingenuous. The propaganda has to be a positive, ie it needs to work to the benefit of the propagandizer obviously.
You'd better do some studying on propaganda. You don't seem to understand what it is.
Projecting again.
Then as I said, the Chinese could easily use Bush not going to the Olympics to say that Bush does not support the American athletes. I would think it obvious that the Chinese, if they are the enemy you've indicated, would do anything to make the U.S. look bad and/or them look good in comparison.
If they wouldn't find any benefit in that, then they obviously aren't that much of an enemy.
Projecting again.
LOL Dream on, Alice. You'll get to Wonderland some day.
I said he may be doing that. It's much more likely than your claim that he was going to an international athletic event to honor the Chinese government.
But of course, you knew that already. You're just being disingenous.
Most nonsense posters use the "adolescent taunt" tactic before the "projection" tactic. Good for you for changing up the routine.
I guess it depends on what time frame you choose to focus on. If you take the 20th century as a whole, more Americans actually died at the hands of Germans. Either way, both are in the past. Which to be more angry at then becomes a matter of choice.
I notice you haven’t answered my question as yet. ;)
By the way, where is your post to me that proves others asked the questions you did? ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.