Especially when she presents it as being "against women" as she did. At least a 50% chance (and probably much higher) that she's the one with the issues -- issues with men who have issues.
Not getting much scrutiny is the discosure that her comments were added to his file in pen. Added by whom? Why in pen? An afterthought? Added when? After the fact?
She loses most of her credibility.
Remember the social worker who created that fiasco in Texas a few months back? The one who made anonymous calls claiming kiddie rape and incest within that religious group? It turned out to be the social worker who had the screw loose. The state spent a fortune and lost a great deal of credibility.
#39
“against women”
Interestingly, Ivins wrote a letter to the editor of his local paper urging the Catholic Church to allow women to become priests.