[count-your-change]

Where is the study and what am I supposed to conclude from this statement from Duesberg’s site? How do you know that the V.A. study “followed scientific protocols” (if you know what those are)? If the CDC is not to be trusted why would I trust the V.A.?
And yes I do say it is a matter (not simple) of pro and con since studies will continue and results and interpretations will differ. For that reason dueling studies is a pointless exercise. I presented a study arguing one way and I'm not sure what the V.A. study argues. Again the central question was whether HIV causes AIDS, something the experience of the French hemophiliacs (and others) demonstrates to be the case. Do you think there is a single person in any branch of medicine that really believes HIV is not responsible for AIDS? If there is would they accept a transfusion with HIV in it? Would you? These are the salient questions, aren't they?

[GodGunsGuts]

Don’t just sit on your hands. Take the time to read about the side effects of AZT. Hundreds of scientists and medical doctors are convinced this drug alone (not to mention all the other AIDS chemo drugs) killed tens to hundreds of thousands.

Side effects of AZT chemotherapy listed by category:

http://aras.ab.ca/azt.html