Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xDGx

Yes, I have read all those (and many, many more). Rethinking AIDS scientists have shredded their arguments long ago, and continue to do so now. You are correct to point out they are in the minority, but the movement to challenge the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is growing all the time, both in the scientific and medical communities, and in the general public. And besides, science is not decided by majority opinion. Indeed, just think the state science would be in if it was decided by majority vote!


28 posted on 08/02/2008 1:16:52 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

Good science is decided by meeting certain tests. Koch’s is an excellent example of clearly identifying a pathogen.

I happen to agree with a good deal of what you have written, but not on the source angle. HIV is well-defined, and repeatable as causation. Recreational drugs as a source of an autoimmune disorder is just not supported by the data.


29 posted on 08/02/2008 1:22:45 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson