Skip to comments.
Ex-Boeing employee is charged in vandalism case
Delco Times ^
| 1 August 2008
| Timothy Logue
Posted on 08/02/2008 5:18:39 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: A.A. Cunningham
Ten years??? Give him 50!
To: Gay State Conservative
Vandalism hell!
It was sabotage.
3
posted on
08/02/2008 5:31:16 AM PDT
by
sport
To: A.A. Cunningham
"Matthew has no priors, is working full-time right now and I am hoping to argue for a non-custodial sentence," she said. And if your client had done this during WWII,sweetie,he would have been put up against the wall.And that nation would have cheered.
To: sport
Vandalism hell! It was sabotage. You got it,pal.
To: Gay State Conservative
6
posted on
08/02/2008 5:33:24 AM PDT
by
yorkie01
To: A.A. Cunningham
7
posted on
08/02/2008 5:35:34 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(His Negritude has made his negritude the central theme of this campaign)
To: A.A. Cunningham
... Meehan said the severed wires posed "... no risk of injury because, as I understand it, the helicopter would never (have been) able to take off." So if the sabotaged helicopter injures or kills its passengers and crew on the ground, it's OK by this public defender?
8
posted on
08/02/2008 5:40:54 AM PDT
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: Gay State Conservative
Your compassion is showing.
He needs to take helo ride, and be let out at 10,000 ft.
Calling this vandalism lessens the crime, this was sabotage, thank God they caught him before he sabo’d an Osprey.
9
posted on
08/02/2008 5:41:18 AM PDT
by
Nailbiter
To: Gay State Conservative
The punishment for sabotage during time of war is 30 years. Maybe the reason they can’t charge it is because the damned idiots in Congress has never formally declared war.
10
posted on
08/02/2008 5:43:14 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: Nailbiter
18 U.S.C. § 2156. Production of defective national-defense material, national-defense premises, or national-defense utilities
(a) Whoever, with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense of the United States, willfully makes, constructs, or attempts to make or construct in a defective manner, any national-defense material, national-defense premises or national-defense utilities, or any tool, implement, machine, utensil, or receptacle used or employed in making, producing, manufacturing, or repairing any such national-defense material, national-defense premises or national-defense utilities, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
11
posted on
08/02/2008 5:44:48 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: jriemer
The helicopter wasn't going anywhere. What he did wasn't subtle...
This sounds like a union thing... Bill the union too...
12
posted on
08/02/2008 5:46:40 AM PDT
by
DB
To: mvpel
Time to change that law.
Willful vandalism of material destined for Military personnell should be capital offense.
Upon conviction there should be only one sentence, death.
To: mvpel
The punishment for sabotage during time of war is 30 years. Maybe the reason they cant charge it is because the damned idiots in Congress has never formally declared war.It's not like he was the New York Times publishing leaked Classified Information, or anything.
To: A.A. Cunningham
Montgomery's attorney, public defender Mara Meehan, said she would push for leniency at sentencing if he pleads guilty or is convicted. WTF?
15
posted on
08/02/2008 6:15:53 AM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Take him up and toss him out. No chute.
16
posted on
08/02/2008 6:54:35 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: A.A. Cunningham
...facing up to 10 years in prison and $500,000 in fines and restitution for severing a bundle of wires on a Chinook helicopter.
Not enough. Make it 50 years or more.
17
posted on
08/02/2008 7:15:00 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Bradley said the investigation continues and a reward still stands for information leading to the arrest of the person or persons responsible for damaging the transmission of a second Chinook. This sounds quite serious. Possibly like the kind of problem in which a Chinook can take off before suffering a catastrophic MLF.
Perhaps Mr. Mongomery could be in the "loop" here too, and might like to trade a few decades worth of additional incarceration for some info?
As a Navy and Marine Dad, I'd like to volunteer for Mongomery's jury.
.
18
posted on
08/02/2008 8:08:21 AM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: A.A. Cunningham
If he pleads or is convicted he deserves a max sentence no matter how much sobbing Ms. Meehan does.
19
posted on
08/02/2008 8:21:17 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: A.A. Cunningham
Matthew has no priors, is working full-time right now... WHERE??? better not still be at Boeing.
20
posted on
08/02/2008 8:44:47 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist -CTHULHU/NYARLATHOTEP'08 = Nothing LESS!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson