Huh? Given that this is Canada, and the killer is Asian, he is either most likely a legal immigrant (Canada has few illegal immigrants) or a native-born Canadian.
>> This is just more of the benefits of wide open
>> immigration and the mindless pursuit of diversity.
> Huh? Given that this is Canada, and the killer is Asian,
> he is either most likely a legal immigrant (Canada has
> few illegal immigrants) or a native-born Canadian.
So? What is the oposition between “wide open immigration” and “legal immigration”? It’s quite the confirmation actually. And if he is a native-born Canadian, then the “wide open immigration” is credited with his forefather’s arrival to Canada.
It’s funny how someone said “more likely schizophrenic then Muslim”. You know, it’s way more common for Muslims to go out stabbing and beheading people then schizophrenics. Of course the schirophrenia lobby is weaker then the Muslim, so it’s safer to pin the assumption on that disease.
I’m betting on Uighur. Muslim Chinese.
You're both right.
I was so upset I didn't do a very good job of making my post very clear.
The point and connection I didn't make very well is that the PC mindset that most likely brought this man to Canada (legally or illegally) is the same as we see happening here in the USA.
There don't seem to be many standards in either country for legal immigration (with the possible exception of Caucasians), and of course illegal immigrants enter with no controls whatsoever.
How long before we read some convoluted charges that the killer himself is the real victim here because of the failures of western culture?