Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tehran's Tricks: Plays Rope-A-Dope On Nukes
NYPost ^ | August 1, 2008 | Amir Taheri

Posted on 08/01/2008 8:03:50 AM PDT by nuconvert

Tehran's Tricks: Plays Rope-A-Dope On Nukes

August 1, 2008

TOMORROW is the deadline for Iran to respond to the latest offer on its nuclear program. The package, shaped by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany and offered in Geneva two weeks ago, offers a way out of the impasse.

But don't expect Tehran to call the lead negotiator, European Union foreign-policy czar Javier Solana, to say it's accepted the deal. Iran has made it clear it doesn't intend to show any flexibility.

"Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad set the tone Wednesday in speeches at a gathering of officials and militants in Tehran.

"The only way to victory passes through resistance and steadfastness," said Khamenei. "We shall not allow anyone to dictate to us."

Ahmadinejad went further. "The United States is a sunset power," he said. "American foreign policy has failed everywhere and the American economy is facing collapse."

The EU compromise (offered in the presence of the No. 3 US diplomat, William Burns) was a timid attempt at opening a new space for negotiations. Under its formula, Tehran would freeze its uranium-enrichment program at present levels for six weeks. In exchange, the Security Council would undertake not to impose new sanctions during that period.

That deal represents a major concession to Iran - envisioning a suspension of enrichment and processing activities, not the total and verifiable end demanded by three mandatory Security Council resolutions.

When the Security Council passed the first of those resolutions last year, Iran had only a dozen centrifuges enriching uranium. Now it has more than 6,000. Thus, the "freeze" formula would let the Islamic Republic continue its nuclear project at levels far above what the United Nations once deemed completely unacceptable.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: amirtaheri; eu; geopolitics; iran; irannukes; islam; mohammedanism; mrtaheri; nuclear; nucleariran; nukes; proliferation; taheri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/01/2008 8:03:50 AM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Well, don't expect anything more than talk out of THIS Administration, they're pinning their hopes on 'diplomacy':
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
2 posted on 08/01/2008 8:06:17 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

We’ll see ........


3 posted on 08/01/2008 8:07:11 AM PDT by nuconvert (Obama - Preferred by 4 out of 5 Dictators & Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
So are we now down to talking about talks? If Israel doesn't do something, no one else will. The EU and the US won't be able to muster the fortitude to actually strike Iran or impose severe sanctions IMO.
4 posted on 08/01/2008 8:09:42 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I kind of agree with mkjessup; I'm not expecting anything either.

Always willing to be pleasantly surprised, though..

5 posted on 08/01/2008 8:10:10 AM PDT by sionnsar (Impeach Obama |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I sincerely hope and pray that I am proven wrong, that the final act of this Administration will be to undertake the largest terraforming project of all time, the “Creation of the New Persian Sea”. :)


6 posted on 08/01/2008 8:31:46 AM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Iran is dragging these feebs around by their noses. They should be embarrassed.


7 posted on 08/01/2008 8:34:50 AM PDT by TChris (Vote John McCain: Democrat Lite -- 3% less liberal than a regular Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

8 posted on 08/01/2008 8:39:42 AM PDT by allmendream (If "the New Yorker" makes a joke, and liberals don't get it, is it still funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

This seems like Europe’s problem; let them deal with it. There’s no reason for us to stick our noses into someone else’s fight. Iran is not a threat to the USA.


9 posted on 08/01/2008 9:39:45 AM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
Iran is not a threat to the USA.

So you don’t consider their open support for worldwide terrorism and repeated calls for the end of the great satin to be anything to worry about then?

10 posted on 08/01/2008 10:40:14 AM PDT by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I doubt it. The only way the U.S. (President BUSH ok’s an attack) will use military force is if a majority of the American people and a majority of congress agree to a massive use of American force (tactical nuclear strikes) and in todays political climate it AIN’T GOING TO HAPPEN! Bottom line Iran gets the bomb.


11 posted on 08/01/2008 10:43:16 AM PDT by 2001convSVT ("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: usurper

Not really. Name one attack against the USA from Shia. WTC I; WTC II; the Cole; the Pentagon; the CIA; all Sunni (Queda). I think the price from inflaming and uniting the Muslim world against us will outweigh the cost from Iran’s attempt to keep up w/ Israel in the nuclear arms race, especially since Iran’s nukes are a threat to Europe and Israel, not the USA.


12 posted on 08/01/2008 11:23:11 AM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
How about the kidnapping of the hostages?

Many say the current President was involved in that one.

13 posted on 08/01/2008 11:37:29 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: what's up

The best you could come up with was 1979?


14 posted on 08/01/2008 1:35:24 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sobieski

I guess you missed the point about one of the kidnappers now running the show over there?


15 posted on 08/01/2008 1:56:49 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
“Iran’s nukes are a threat to Europe and Israel, not the USA.”

I don't agree. Could they not simply ship a special package to an American harbor and detonate it? No real need for long range missiles.

Am I wrong?

16 posted on 08/01/2008 2:18:31 PM PDT by Free Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Free Bee

A) Never been done.

B) The scenario appears to be more of a fantasy used by Iran’s enemies to try to entice the USA to bomb Iran

If Europe’s not concerned, there’s important information there. That argues for us to go slowly; after all, if it’s such a threat then those countries with actual militant Islamic minorities in them logically should be more concerned. Yet they aren’t...


17 posted on 08/01/2008 2:26:53 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: what's up

A bit of a leap from taking hostages in Tehran to actually being a risk to the USA.


18 posted on 08/01/2008 2:29:14 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
On the contrary, a few nukes lead to a bigger and better nuke industry which becomes an increasing threat to US security.

Oh, did you forget the Shiite attack on our men in the Beirut barracks?

19 posted on 08/01/2008 2:36:22 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sobieski

after all, if it’s such a threat then those countries with actual militant Islamic minorities in them logically should be more concerned. Yet they aren’t...

And you believe this why?


20 posted on 08/01/2008 3:38:12 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson