He might be able to read a teleprompter out loud with a speaking voice that people find attractive, and he may have been book smart while in school, but he just doesn't seem like the sharpest knife in the drawer, or the brightest bulb in the candelabra, or ...
” He’s not arrogant, he’s stupid.”
Or as my cousin in Montana says, all hat, no cattle.........
“he may have been book smart while in school”
What makes you think that? As a student, he was an unflunkable affirmative action student. Or are you referring to his teaching days? His “Answer Memo” for his con law final was very telling. It was 2 months late in coming, he says because he thought it had been sent out earlier. I call BS. I’d bet real money that it was late because what he did was combine the best answers from his students to arrive at the “right answers.” Those “answers” were simply too long for anyone to have written during the final itself, indicating to me that it was a conglomeration of many students’ answers. Thus, even as a law school “professor,” all he did was parot what others - text book authors, his own students, etc. - had said. Just like reading a teleprompter...