Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
i am fully capable of being the storm trooper of whom you speak. but i have chosen to take a different route in my career.

and yes the constitution guards against unreasonable search and seizure. i, and the law, however see this circumstance as very reasonable.

overzealous? perhaps. but that is not for me to decide. i wasn't there. it seems many posters on this thread were there, though.

210 posted on 07/31/2008 1:47:32 PM PDT by thefactor (contributing nothing of value to threads since 2001...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: thefactor
And as Shakespeare once opined, "the Law is an ass". More importantly, the Founders themselves regarded any law passed by the States or Congress that ran contrary to the Constitution as "no law". Part of that whole Art 6 para 2 thingie you and the rest of the law business types like to overlook as it helps you justify your paycheck.

Raids like this are not just bad "policy". From a Constitutional/Freedom stand point... they are downright evil. And that isn't just hyperbole speaking there.

They have no place in any Country trying to kid itself into thinking it's still based on "freedom" at all.

216 posted on 07/31/2008 1:52:08 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson