Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: absolootezer0
what about people that don’t smoke, and now sit at the bar longer because they aren’t being bothered by the smoke?

They're far outweighed by those who no longer patronize the bars at all because some nanny-state ninny decided to butt (no pun intended) into an area that was no concern at all of theirs to begin with.

L

4 posted on 07/31/2008 10:33:34 AM PDT by Lurker (Islam is an insane death cult. Any other aspects are PR to get them within throat-cutting range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker
The kicker to me has always been that they refuse to allow the owners choice or the smokers choice, it's either their way or the highway.

If 23/27% of adults smoke, give 23/27% local tavern and saloon owners at least the option of having a smoking section. They 'll never do it because they are minor league bullies without the brown shirts and common sense, manners and courtesy mean nothing to them. They'd rather take the 2.5 extra deaths per county (How many counties are there?) than admit they can't pound a certain number of people into their imagined utopia.

I hate their hypocrisy and the smug assumption of superiority.

35 posted on 07/31/2008 2:26:11 PM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson