Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rosenfan
Not wanting to procreate is "flat out selfish"?

I read post #13 in reply and wouldn't agree either with the context-less idea. Someone might have children for arguably selfish reasons, and someone might decide not to have children for arguably unselfish reasons.

But I still can see lots of people not having children for arguably selfish reasons, too.

Look at the popularity of the very term "child-free." It gives me the impression, especially in hand with all the other "-free" terms, that children are a nuisance, an inconvenience, a burden--or worse. Even if I had decided not to have children for Personal Reasons, I could never identify myself with that term or with a group using the term--unless I actually agreed with that impression.

15 posted on 07/31/2008 9:45:05 AM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Lonely Bull
Objectively speaking, children are a nuisance, and inconvenience, and a burden. They are also (for some) a joy and a blessing.

I'm not so sure that "childfree" has a positive connotation, any more than "childless" has a negative one.

17 posted on 07/31/2008 9:57:11 AM PDT by rosenfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson