I defy anyone to prove that wasn’t printed last week in a modern print shop, if they can even prove it ever existed outside of a computer memory.
A document with no provenance that is very low resolution image of what is said to be a microfilm of an originally poor quality printed copy of a neighborhood advertiser isn’t very compelling evidence to shore up a web image of an obviously altered official document.
The only thing that argues this is genuine is that it was found by a clinton operative.
God forbid that anything I care about depends on the veracity of anything remotely related to the clintons.
I suppose all that would be required to do this is to look up microfilm of the Honolulu Advertiser at a library. According to Wikipedia it is the largest newspaper in Hawaii. I assumed that is where this image came from.
The Clintons have aversion to a blue dress. Anything else is acceptable.