Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sig226

I just found this little footnote at the bottom of the “dynamic modelling” page.

*Designing it was not that hard - optimizing a mechanism that accelerates backward at 2000 g’s was the hard part.


30 posted on 07/29/2008 8:56:25 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Thig crioch air an t-saoghail, ach mairidh gaol 's ceol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre

An external hammer makes sense. There’s not much room for a sear to release a striker like in a Glock. The feeding mechanism is in the way. You could build a sear that reached over the feed area and make it in a U shape, like the 1911 trigger bar. This would make it rigid on both sides, but it would be an expensive part. The hammer is a proven mechanism, and this thing has some radical ideas. If I thought of it, I would want to use established methods wherever I could so that any problems would be easy to isolate.


31 posted on 07/29/2008 9:06:25 PM PDT by sig226 (Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson