Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: littlehouse36

If it has to be one of those two, I would go with Romney all the way.

Romney is the more energetic campaigner, and I can visualize him getting under Obama’s skin.

Pawlenty will be about as effective as Dan Quayle was.


5 posted on 07/29/2008 3:19:31 PM PDT by WilliamReading
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: WilliamReading

Agree. Romney.


7 posted on 07/29/2008 3:22:18 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamReading

Excellent point!


10 posted on 07/29/2008 3:24:09 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Osama is Carter's second term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamReading
Pawlenty will be about as effective as Dan Quayle was.

EXACTLY!

Pawlenty, while a nice enough guy, leaves me totally UNimpressed.

With McCain/Pawlenty... it will be like Mr Boring and Mr. More Boring....

Puhleeze McCain campaign... do the right thing and pick Mr. Romney. If people can't accept Romney's denomination, then quite frankly, they shouldn't even be in the Republican Party because that goes EXACTLY against what being a Republican is all about.

14 posted on 07/29/2008 3:29:28 PM PDT by Edit35 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson