Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightinthemiddle
It may be strange to say, but an earthquake at 5.8 might be a good thing...it doesn’t do a lot of damage, but relieves a lot of the stress and pent up energy on the fault.
That may mean a reduced chance of a much larger quake later.
Thoughts, anyone?

Not really, because for each magnitude 30 times more energy is released.

This area contains faults capable of generating quakes up to M 6.7; such a quake would release well over 30 times the energy of this quake; you'd need perhaps 50 of these quakes to release enough energy to prevent a large damaging quake. The numbers just don't add up.

502 posted on 07/29/2008 1:59:05 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

Thanks for the info.


509 posted on 07/29/2008 2:07:57 PM PDT by rightinthemiddle (The Mainstream Media Controls Our Party. Go, RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist
"Not really, because for each magnitude 30 times more energy is released.This area contains faults capable of generating quakes up to M 6.7; such a quake would release well over 30 times the energy of this quake; you'd need perhaps 50 of these quakes to release enough energy to prevent a large damaging quake. The numbers just don't add up".

I nominate this for Post Of The Day. You are entirely correct and I TOTALLY BUMP this post!

639 posted on 07/29/2008 10:03:59 PM PDT by Pagey (Horrible Hillary Clinton is Bad For America, Bad For Business and Bad For MY Stomach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson