Skip to comments.
Heller II: Heller Harder
Reason Magazine ^
| 28 July, 2008
| David Weigel
Posted on 07/29/2008 4:04:48 AM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
This should be a slam dunk. But.. with the liberals on the courts and the support for the corrupt DC government in the MSM, the protection of our rights is under attack.
1
posted on
07/29/2008 4:04:48 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
WOOHOO! Finally, some legal action against this bizarre action by Fenty and his whackos! Go Heller!
2
posted on
07/29/2008 4:09:03 AM PDT
by
TexasRedeye
(Eschew obfuscation)
To: marktwain
The only way to put a stop to DC's monkey business is to force them to respect the Second Amendment.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
3
posted on
07/29/2008 4:15:50 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
The only way to put a stop to DC's monkey business is to force them to respect the Second Amendment. IMO the only way is to get a large number of people "spontaneously" to announce that they have firearms in their homes, various types, newly acquired or not, registered or not, and thereby offer the authorities an opportunity to do something or nothing. Given the fatty, sluggish condition of govt these days, they just might do nothing, but at the very least they wouldn't do anything right :)
It wouldn't take much organization, and wouldn't amount to an insurrection. Just a little passive aggressiveness on the Potomac.
To: marktwain
I’m surprised that the original wording passed muster. When it says that “Only marriage between a man and a woman...”, it is ambiguous. The literal interpretation could be that other types of contracts, unrelated to marriage, would not be recognized. Better wording would be: “Marriage between only a man and a woman...”
5
posted on
07/29/2008 4:37:47 AM PDT
by
Real Cynic No More
(The only thing standing between us and complete victory over the evildoers is POLITICS!)
To: Real Cynic No More
“Im surprised that the original wording passed muster. When it says that Only marriage between a man and a woman..., it is ambiguous. The literal interpretation could be that other types of contracts, unrelated to marriage, would not be recognized. Better wording would be: Marriage between only a man and a woman...”
I suspect that you meant this to be posted in response to a post on the California referendum. Did you post it on this thread by mistake?
6
posted on
07/29/2008 4:43:26 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: goldstategop
The only way to put a stop to DC's monkey business is to force them to respect the Second Amendment. There IS another way, but I believe it is illegal, at least, in "modern" times. :)
7
posted on
07/29/2008 4:46:50 AM PDT
by
DocH
(hussein and juan - what kind of choice is THAT? God help us.)
To: DocH
And mentioning that “other way” is unfortunately contrary to FR posting guidelines but I know exactly what you mean.
Commissar Fenty and his crew need to personally experience the “thrill” of gun ownership, then they might have a better appreciation of the Second Amendment.
8
posted on
07/29/2008 5:00:20 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Obama-flakes! = Little suntanned Jimmy Carters with twice the empty rhetoric , from DNC cereals!)
To: DocH; goldstategop
There IS another way, but I believe it is illegal, at least, in "modern" times. :)It would only be illegal if the totalitarians won. Otherwise it would be an extralegal method of seizing the reins of government from those who abuse their authority.
9
posted on
07/29/2008 5:05:25 AM PDT
by
magslinger
(Infidel, American type, quantity one (1) each.)
To: magslinger
I like the way you think.
10
posted on
07/29/2008 5:07:46 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Obama-flakes! = Little suntanned Jimmy Carters with twice the empty rhetoric , from DNC cereals!)
To: marktwain
No need for Fenty and his minions to make any real permanent changes. After all the Obaessiah will be in office in just 6 short months and all this Supreme court claptrap will disappear. /sarc
I really do believe that’s how he thinks.
11
posted on
07/29/2008 5:39:40 AM PDT
by
lrb111
(Minutemen - Doing jobs the White House won't do.)
To: mkjessup
We’d better hang together. It beats hanging separately.
12
posted on
07/29/2008 5:58:43 AM PDT
by
magslinger
(Infidel, American type, quantity one (1) each.)
To: magslinger
According to my friends Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson, they won’t be hanging me FRiend, and I suspect you have the same friends. ;)
13
posted on
07/29/2008 6:39:00 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Obama-flakes! = Little suntanned Jimmy Carters with twice the empty rhetoric , from DNC cereals!)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
14
posted on
07/29/2008 6:56:43 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: marktwain
It is exactly what I thought would happen.
15
posted on
07/29/2008 7:51:07 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: marktwain
Heller returns to court to get a judgment against the city of DC that will read “A semi-automatic firearm is not recognized as a machinegun. Also, stop screwing around with the trigger lock and disassembly requirements. The US Supreme Court already spelled it out for you ignant peanutheads on the city council.”
To: marktwain
Short rope, tall tree.
Bucket of tar and goose down feather pillows.
Repeat as necessary until these morons figure out "shall not be infringed" will be ENFORCED...
17
posted on
07/29/2008 8:52:39 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: magslinger
Extralegal? The Declaration and the supporting documentation (Elliot's Debates, Anti and federalist Papers, Etc...) all point out the citizens ultimate Right of defense and redress via force of arms. This was why RKBA was codified in the BoR to begin with.
Difficult, dangerous, and "a last resort", definately... but hardly "extralegal". Maybe "supralegal" would be a better nomenclature. It is "above" the law, not "outside" it.
18
posted on
07/29/2008 8:59:26 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: Dead Corpse
Goose down feathers are to good for those bozo’s get a bunch of chicken feather pillows instead.
19
posted on
07/29/2008 9:11:43 AM PDT
by
Nebr FAL owner
(.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
To: marktwain
I don't know why anybody ever thought the anti-2nd Amendment Liberals would respect this decision. They've always been against the Constitution.
20
posted on
07/29/2008 9:11:59 AM PDT
by
Gritty
(Our Founders never anticipated the self-reliant man would be outlawed before rifles were-Jeremy Gaye)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson