Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oorang
“Shouldn't that be all y'all’s?”

I think you're right. I learned from my Alabama relatives that the simple “y'all” means one person. To address a bunch of people, it probably should be “y'all’s.”

Oh well, everywon makes misteaks.

60 posted on 07/28/2008 5:48:41 PM PDT by EggsAckley ( "the difference between Obama and Osama is just a little b.s.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: EggsAckley

I think you’re right. I learned from my Alabama relatives that the simple “y’all” means one person. To address a bunch of people, it probably should be “y’all’s.”

You were right in your first post. Take it from this Alabamian, “y’all” is plural.


170 posted on 07/28/2008 6:31:28 PM PDT by AUsome Joy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley; Oorang
learned from my Alabama relatives that the simple “y'all” means one person. To address a bunch of people, it probably should be “y'all’s.”

Sorry, but your Alabama relatives are wrong. Y'all is a plural. Anyone who uses it as a singular is usually a sheltered New York or Hollywood writer trying lamely to imitate the Southern vernacular.

Y'all provides the English language with a second person pronoun, like "vous" in French, something formal English lacks. It's an extremely useful word, and I use it freely in all but the most formal settings.

Y'all's is a possessive.

315 posted on 07/29/2008 10:28:26 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson